Literature DB >> 16133153

[Diagnosis specific differences in knee joint geometry. A challenge for the correct axial implantation of long stems in total knee arthroplasty].

M Goebel1, R Burgkart, L Gerdesmeyer, P Diehl, M Schmitt-Sody, W Plötz, R Gradinger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Arthrotic deformities with changes in knee geometry can produce difficulties in implanting long stem knee prosthesis systems using intramedullary alignment. They can result in incorrect lower limb axis and prosthesis positioning. The aim of the presented study was to measure knee geometry in patients with varus and valgus gonarthrosis in order to define diagnosis related differences.
METHODS: A total of 75 patients with indication for total knee arthroplasty were divided in two groups using the weight bearing lower limb axis: patients with varus gonarthrosis (n=43) and with valgus gonarthrosis (n=32). Angles and extensions, important for knee prosthesis implantation, were measured, digitalized and analyzed. The results were investigated for diagnosis specific differences.
RESULTS: After regulation of the measured extension in mean femur/tibia lengths, significant diagnosis specific differences were found: femur condyles were widened towards pathologic weight bearing (P<0.044), and the mechanical tibia axis of the varus gonarthrosis group is transferred to the lateral side (P<0.046) and in projection over the lateral internal cortical substance.
CONCLUSION: The significant differences in deformed arthrotic knees indicate that for an optimal postoperative result the use of standard implants is not always sufficient. Modular knee prosthesis systems can provide adequately for individual demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16133153     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-005-0857-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  34 in total

1.  The trochlea is bilinear and oriented medially.

Authors:  M Barink; S van de Groes; N Verdonschot; M de Waal Malefijt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Total knee arthroplasty in elderly patients. Comparison of tibial component designs.

Authors:  J L L'Insalata; S H Stern; J N Insall
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Anatomy and surface geometry of the patellofemoral joint in the axial plane.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; U Dürrenmatt; B Porcellini; W Rauschning
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-05

4.  The effect of the interface on the bone stresses beneath tibial components.

Authors:  A Garg; P S Walker
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Tibial torsion in patients with medial-type osteoarthritic knee.

Authors:  T Yagi; T Sasaki
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The influence of tibial-patellofemoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilized condylar knee prosthesis.

Authors:  H E Figgie; V M Goldberg; K G Heiple; H S Moller; N H Gordon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity.

Authors:  J R Moreland; L W Bassett; G J Hanker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Nonconstrained implants in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Y Takahashi; R B Gustilo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A new computer-assisted method for measuring the tibio-femoral angle in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  T Takahashi; N Yamanaka; M Komatsu; Y Ogawa; S Yoshida; H Yamamoto
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  J P Mantas; R D Bloebaum; J G Skedros; A A Hofmann
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.