Literature DB >> 7993320

Genetics of a nonoptimal behavior: oviposition preference of Drosophila mauritiana for a toxic resource.

B Moreteau1, S R'Kha, J R David.   

Abstract

Among three sibling species of the D. melanogaster subgroup, two are generalists (D. simulans and D. mauritiana), while the third, D. sechellia, specializes on a single toxic resource, the fruit of Morinda citrifolia. D. sechellia, resistant to the toxics, prefers to oviposit on morinda; D. simulans, which is very sensitive, is strongly repelled. D. mauritiana exhibits an aberrant behavior since it prefers to lay its eggs on morinda, where its embryos are killed. Oviposition behavior, studied in parental species, F1 hybrids, and backcrosses, was mostly an additive genetical trait. Further investigations were made with D. mauritiana and D. simulans carrying recessive markers. The X and second chromosomes had no effect, while a clear effect was found for chromosome 3. Since the toxicity of morinda is due to middle-length fatty acids, the behavior of the three species toward various acids was investigated. We found that D. sechellia exhibited a general oviposition preference for acids, while D. simulans was repelled by acids with at least four carbons. Surprisingly D. mauritiana exhibited behavior quite similar to that of D. simulans. Preference for morinda in D. sechellia and D. mauritiana could be mediated by different chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7993320     DOI: 10.1007/BF01076179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  9 in total

1.  Genetics of morphological differences and hybrid sterility between Drosophila sechellia and its relatives.

Authors:  J A Coyne; J Rux; J R David
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  EVOLUTIONARY GENETICS OF TWO SIBLING SPECIES, DROSOPHILA SIMULANS AND D. SECHELLIA.

Authors:  Jerry A Coyne; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  THE REPRODUCTIVE RELATIONSHIPS OF DROSOPHILA SECHELLIA WITH D. MAURITIANA, D. SIMULANS, AND D. MELANOGASTER FROM THE AFROTROPICAL REGION.

Authors:  Daniel Lachaise; Jean R David; Francoise Lemeunier; Leonidas Tsacas; Michael Ashburner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Short-range genetic structure of Drosophila melanogaster populations in an Afrotropical urban area and its significance.

Authors:  J Vouidibio; P Capy; D Defaye; E Pla; J Sandrin; A Csink; J R David
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  THE GEOGRAPHIC PATTERN OF GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN HOST ASSOCIATED POPULATIONS OF RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES AND CANADA.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Charley A Chilcote; Guy L Bush
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  REGIONAL, LOCAL AND MICROGEOGRAPHIC ALLELE FREQUENCY VARIATION BETWEEN APPLE AND HAWTHORN POPULATIONS OF RHAGOLETIS POMONELLA IN WESTERN MICHIGAN.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Feder; Charley A Chilcote; Guy L Bush
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Genetics of food preference in Drosophila sechellia. I. Responses to food attractants.

Authors:  I Higa; Y Fuyama
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Host-plant specialization in the Drosophila melanogaster species complex: a physiological, behavioral, and genetical analysis.

Authors:  S R'Kha; P Capy; J R David
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Molecular basis ofMorinda citrifolia (L.): Toxicity on drosophila.

Authors:  L Legal; B Chappe; J M Jallon
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.626

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Evolution and inheritance of early embryonic patterning in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia.

Authors:  Susan E Lott; Michael Z Ludwig; Martin Kreitman
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Genetic basis of octanoic acid resistance in Drosophila sechellia: functional analysis of a fine-mapped region.

Authors:  J M Andrade López; S M Lanno; J M Auerbach; E C Moskowitz; L A Sligar; P J Wittkopp; J D Coolon
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Covariance of preference and performance on normal and novel hosts in a locally monophagous and locally polyphagous butterfly population.

Authors:  J L Bossart
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Oviposition preference for and positional avoidance of acetic acid provide a model for competing behavioral drives in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ryan M Joseph; Anita V Devineni; Ian F G King; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Soft Selective Sweep on Chemosensory Genes Correlates with Ancestral Preference for Toxic Noni in a Specialist Drosophila Population.

Authors:  Erina A Ferreira; Sophia Lambert; Thibault Verrier; Frédéric Marion-Poll; Amir Yassin
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 4.096

6.  Tissue-specific activation of a single gustatory receptor produces opposing behavioral responses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Ryan M Joseph; Ulrike Heberlein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.