Literature DB >> 7992739

MR diagnosis of meniscal tears: analysis of causes of errors.

A A De Smet1, M J Tuite, M A Norris, J S Swan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: MR imaging of the knee is an accurate method for diagnosing meniscal tears. However, MR findings do not always agree with surgical findings. In a retrospective study, we analyzed the various causes of incorrect MR diagnoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed a series of 400 MR examinations for suspected meniscal tears in which the diagnostic accuracy was 90%. In this group, we found 70 patients in whom the original MR diagnosis did not agree with the surgical findings. Three musculoskeletal radiologists independently reviewed each of the 70 MR examinations without knowledge of the original interpretation or the surgical findings. Their interpretations and the MR images then were correlated with the surgical findings. The original incorrect diagnoses were categorized as being due to unavoidable errors, errors in interpretation, or errors made because of equivocal MR findings of a tear. Unavoidable errors were defined as false-positive and false-negative diagnoses that could not be avoided, even in retrospect.
RESULTS: Of the 83 original diagnostic errors made in the MR evaluation of 800 menisci, 33 (40%) were unavoidable errors, 32 (39%) were due to equivocal MR findings, and 18 (21%) were due to interpretation errors. The unavoidable errors consisted of 21 missed meniscal tears and 12 false-positive MR diagnoses. In the false-positive cases, the menisci were interpreted as torn on MR images by all three observers, but no tear was found at arthroscopy. Subtle MR findings that were equivocal for a tear caused both false-positive and false-negative diagnoses. Seven of the 18 interpretation errors occurred when normal variants were mistaken for a tear.
CONCLUSION: Using conventional coronal and sagittal spin-echo MR imaging, we could not identify 21 (6%) of the 333 meniscal tears, even in retrospect. In addition, subtle findings that are equivocal for a tear may still make MR diagnosis of every torn meniscus difficult even for experienced radiologists. Unavoidable false-positive diagnoses due to healed tears or tears missed at arthroscopy are an infrequent problem occurring in only 1.5% of the original 800 menisci evaluated with MR imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7992739     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.163.6.7992739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Arthroscopic meniscus surgery].

Authors:  J D Agneskirchner; P Lobenhoffer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Magnetic resonance diagnosis of posterior horn tears of the lateral meniscus using a thin axial plane: the zip sign--a preliminary study.

Authors:  P Y Savoye; J N Ravey; C Dubois; L Pittet Barbier; A Courvoisier; D Saragaglia; G Ferretti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to predict reparability of longitudinal full-thickness meniscus lesions.

Authors:  G Nourissat; P Beaufils; O Charrois; T Ait Si Selmi; P Thoreux; B Moyen; X Cassard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Evaluation of MRI versus arthroscopy in anterior cruciate ligament and meniscal injuries.

Authors:  Amreen Abdul Bari; Shivali Vaibhav Kashikar; Bhushan Narayan Lakhkar; Mohammad Saleem Ahsan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 5.  Meniscus pathology, osteoarthritis and the treatment controversy.

Authors:  Martin Englund; Frank W Roemer; Daichi Hayashi; Michel D Crema; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 6.  [Meniscus and ligament injuries].

Authors:  C Glaser; C Trumm; J Scheidler; A Heuck
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  The efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging in acute multi-ligament injuries.

Authors:  Jyrki Halinen; Mika Koivikko; Jan Lindahl; Eero Hirvensalo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Positive predictive value of maximal posterior joint-line tenderness in diagnosing meniscal pathology: a pilot study.

Authors:  Veronica M R Wadey; Nicholas G H Mohtadi; Robert C Bray; Cyril B Frank
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Correlation of histological examination of meniscus with MR images: focused on high signal intensity of the meniscus not caused by definite meniscal tear and impact on mr diagnosis of tears.

Authors:  Chun Ai Li; Min Ki Kim; In Hwan Kim; Ju Hong Lee; Kyu Yun Jang; Sang Yong Lee
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Anterior rim tibial plateau fractures and posterolateral corner knee injury.

Authors:  D Lee Bennett; Michael J George; Georges Y El-Khoury; Mark D Stanley; Murali Sundaram
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2003-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.