Literature DB >> 7992175

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The early experience of surgical attendings compared with that of residents trained by apprenticeship.

W J Hodgson1, D W Byrne, J A Savino, G Liberis.   

Abstract

During our first year of laparoscopic surgery, all cases were performed by attending surgeons; resident involvement was confined to camera work and occasionally to acting as first assistant. These residents were PGY3 or -4. During our second year, these same residents, who had learned the craft in the traditional apprenticeship method, on promotion to senior resident functioned as the primary surgeon in laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases, but under very close guidance by the credentialed attending. Ninety-two cases were attempted in the first year and 100 in the second. There were no differences in age, gender, or preoperative symptoms. More than half the patients had at least one co-morbidity in addition to their gallbladder disease. More women had laparoscopic cholecystectomy soon after pregnancy in the second year, but the percent of the patients with previous surgery declined from 21.4% to 5%. There was a threefold increase in the percent of cases performed in less than two hours and there was a significant reduction in hospital length of stay in the second year. Complication rates were similar in the first and second years. Training residents to do laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be done in a traditional residency program provided the attendings are adequately trained. However, the residents need a higher level of skill at this time than was necessary for open cholecystectomy and have to be further advanced in their training in order to perform this operation laparoscopically.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7992175     DOI: 10.1007/BF00705719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  13 in total

1.  A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-04-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Threat or opportunity?

Authors:  R K Tompkins
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1990-10

4.  Laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy. A comparison with mini-lap cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Endosurgical training methods: is it surgical training that is out of control?

Authors:  K A Forde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Reflections on surgical training.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A practical approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C R Voyles; A B Petro; A L Meena; A J Haick; A M Koury
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Treatment of choice for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; S B Edge; J Dix; M J Hyser; J B Hanks; R S Jones
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H A Graves; J F Ballinger; W J Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a tertiary referral center.

Authors:  W J Hodgson; S Mercan; J Morgan
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1993-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  How to pass on expertise: pancreatoduodenectomy at a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Peter Wamser; Anton Stift; Christian Passler; Peter Goetzinger; Thomas Sautner; Raimund Jakesz; Reinhold Fuegger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-09-26       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Minimal access surgery--which path to competence?

Authors:  K A Forde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey.

Authors:  S B Archer; D W Brown; C D Smith; G D Branum; J G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Impact on laboratory training in subsequent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Toshihiko Shinohara; Tetsuji Fujita; Takeyuki Misawa; Taro Sakamoto; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Katsuhiko Yanaga
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Implications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgical residency training.

Authors:  D Böckler; J Geoghegan; M Klein; Q Weissmann; M Turan; L Meyer; J Scheele
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees.

Authors:  S G Koulas; J Tsimoyiannis; I Koutsourelakis; N Zikos; G Pappas-Gogos; P Siakas; E C Tsimoyiannis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Quality and safety of minimally invasive surgery: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Bernadette McCrory; Chad A LaGrange; Ms Hallbeck
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2014-04-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.