Literature DB >> 7991247

Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: value of monitoring cochlear nerve action potentials.

J M Nedzelski1, C M Chiong, M Z Cashman, S G Stanton, D W Rowed.   

Abstract

This study reviews the hearing results in 80 consecutive patients who underwent complete removal of histologically proven acoustic neuromas by use of the suboccipital approach. Of these, 56 patients had successful monitoring of cochlear compound action potentials; 20 were not monitored because their surgery predated monitoring; and 4 had unsuccessful monitoring. A significant difference was found in hearing preservation rates between the group in whom compound action potential monitoring was performed and those in whom monitoring was either unavailable or failed (p = 0.02). Overall, 38% (30 of 80) had preserved hearing. There were 51 patients in whom the click threshold for the cochlear compound action potential was measured during surgery. Twenty-one patients had a threshold shift of 20 dB or less, 15 (71%) of these retained serviceable hearing (speech reception threshold < or = 50 dB; speech discrimination score > or = 60%). Of 12 patients in whom the threshold shift was 30 to 60 dB, none had serviceable hearing after surgery. The click threshold shift was predictive of a significant postoperative hearing change (p < 0.001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7991247     DOI: 10.1177/019459989411100602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  6 in total

1.  Advantages of a new, atraumatic, self-retaining electrode for direct cochlear nerve monitoring.

Authors:  M J Ruckenstein; R A Cueva; G R Prioleau
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  1997

2.  Hearing preservation after acoustic neuroma surgery.

Authors:  V J Jaisinghani; S C Levine; E Nussbaum; S Haines; B Lindgren
Journal:  Skull Base Surg       Date:  2000

3.  Cochlear nerve action potential monitoring with the microdissector in vestibular schwannoma surgery.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Nobuhiro Watanabe; Mariko Takahashi; Akira Inagaki; Motoki Tanikawa; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Skull Base       Date:  2009-09

4.  Auditory Brain Stem Response Predictors of Hearing Outcomes after Middle Fossa Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas.

Authors:  Yin Ren; Catherine M Merna; Kareem O Tawfik; Marc S Schwartz; Rick A Friedman
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-21

5.  Preoperative characteristics of auditory brainstem response in acoustic neuroma with useful hearing: importance as a preliminary investigation for intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  Noritaka Aihara; Shingo Murakami; Mariko Takahashi; Kazuo Yamada
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Surgical management for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus statement on behalf of the EANS skull base section.

Authors:  Daniele Starnoni; Lorenzo Giammattei; Giulia Cossu; Michael J Link; Pierre-Hugues Roche; Ari G Chacko; Kenji Ohata; Majid Samii; Ashish Suri; Michael Bruneau; Jan F Cornelius; Luigi Cavallo; Torstein R Meling; Sebastien Froelich; Marcos Tatagiba; Albert Sufianov; Dimitrios Paraskevopoulos; Idoya Zazpe; Moncef Berhouma; Emmanuel Jouanneau; Jeroen B Verheul; Constantin Tuleasca; Mercy George; Marc Levivier; Mahmoud Messerer; Roy Thomas Daniel
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 2.216

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.