Literature DB >> 7989555

Evaluation of a novel colorimetric broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast isolates.

M A Pfaller1, A L Barry.   

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of two broth microdilution methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of 600 clinical yeast isolates (Candida spp., Torulopsis glabrata, and Cryptococcus neoformans) against amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine (5FC) was conducted. Microdilution testing was performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) recommendations (NCCLS document M27-P). By using the growth control for comparison, reference microdilution MIC endpoints for amphotericin B were scored as the lowest concentration at which a score of 0 (complete absence of growth) was observed, and those for 5FC and fluconazole were scored at the lowest concentration at which a score of 2 (prominent decrease in turbidity) (MIC-2) was observed. The second microdilution method employed a colorimetric endpoint using an oxidation-reduction indicator (Alamar Biosciences, Inc., Sacramento, Calif.) and was assessed independently of the reference microdilution MICs. The MICs for the two microdilution test systems were read after 24 and 48 h of incubation. Excellent agreement between the reference and colorimetric microdilution MICs was observed. Overall agreement was > or = 95% for all three drugs at 24 h. At 48 h, agreement was > or = 98% for amphotericin B and 5FC but dropped to 84% for fluconazole. Given these results it appears that the colorimetric microdilution approach to antifungal susceptibility testing may be viable alternative to the NCCLS reference method for testing yeasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7989555      PMCID: PMC263916          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.32.8.1992-1996.1994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Collaborative comparison of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; C W Kish; T M Kerkering; R A Fromtling; K Bartizal; J N Galgiani; K Villareal; M A Pfaller; T Gerarden; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Standardization of antifungal susceptibility testing.

Authors:  J N Galgiani; M G Rinaldi; A M Polak; M A Pfaller
Journal:  J Med Vet Mycol       Date:  1992

3.  Comparison of relative susceptibilities of Candida species to three antifungal agents as determined by unstandardized methods.

Authors:  J N Galgiani; J Reiser; C Brass; A Espinel-Ingroff; M A Gordon; T M Kerkering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Antifungal susceptibility testing. Current state of technology, limitations, and standardization.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.982

5.  Comparative evaluation of alternative methods for broth dilution susceptibility testing of fluconazole against Candida albicans.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; C Grant; V Morthland; J Rhine-Chalberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Multicenter evaluation of four methods of yeast inoculum preparation.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Burmeister; M S Bartlett; M G Rinaldi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Collaborative investigation of variables in susceptibility testing of yeasts.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M G Rinaldi; J N Galgiani; M S Bartlett; B A Body; A Espinel-Ingroff; R A Fromtling; G S Hall; C E Hughes; F C Odds
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Multicenter evaluation of a broth macrodilution antifungal susceptibility test for yeasts.

Authors:  R A Fromtling; J N Galgiani; M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; K F Bartizal; M S Bartlett; B A Body; C Frey; G Hall; G D Roberts
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Results of a survey of antifungal susceptibility tests in the United States and interlaboratory comparison of broth dilution testing of flucytosine and amphotericin B.

Authors:  D L Calhoun; G D Roberts; J N Galgiani; J E Bennett; D S Feingold; J Jorgensen; G S Kobayashi; S Shadomy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison study of broth macrodilution and microdilution antifungal susceptibility tests.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; T M Kerkering; P R Goldson; S Shadomy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  68 in total

1.  Comparative study of agar diffusion test and the NCCLS macrobroth method for in vitro susceptibility testing of Candida spp.

Authors:  L M Soni; M N Burattini; A C Pignatari; O F Gompertz; A L Colombo
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.574

2.  Fluorometric assessment of In vitro antidermatophytic activities of antimycotics based on their keratin-penetrating power.

Authors:  C N Okeke; R Tsuboi; M Kawai; H Ogawa
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Use of the sensititre colorimetric microdilution panel for antifungal susceptibility testing of dermatophytes.

Authors:  I Pujol; J Capilla; B Fernández-Torres; M Ortoneda; J Guarro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Collaborative study of the NCCLS and flow cytometry methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.

Authors:  Vishnu Chaturvedi; Rama Ramani; Michael A Pfaller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparative evaluation of a new fluorescent carboxyfluorescein diacetate-modified microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans isolates.

Authors:  Robert S Liao; Robert P Rennie; James A Talbot
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Resazurin microtiter assay plate: simple and inexpensive method for detection of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Juan-Carlos Palomino; Anandi Martin; Mirtha Camacho; Humberto Guerra; Jean Swings; Françoise Portaels
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Multicenter comparison of the sensititre YeastOne Colorimetric Antifungal Panel with the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory standards M27-A reference method for testing clinical isolates of common and emerging Candida spp., Cryptococcus spp., and other yeasts and yeast-like organisms.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M Pfaller; S A Messer; C C Knapp; S Killian; H A Norris; M A Ghannoum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Interlaboratory evaluation of Etest method for testing antifungal susceptibilities of pathogenic yeasts to five antifungal agents by using Casitone agar and solidified RPMI 1640 medium with 2% glucose.

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M Pfaller; M E Erwin; R N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Quality control guidelines for National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommended broth macrodilution testing of amphotericin B, fluconazole, and flucytosine.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; M Bale; B Buschelman; M Lancaster; A Espinel-Ingroff; J H Rex; M G Rinaldi; C R Cooper; M R McGinnis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Susceptibility testing of Candida albicans and Aspergillus species by a simple microtiter menadione-augmented 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide assay.

Authors:  B Jahn; E Martin; A Stueben; S Bhakdi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.