Literature DB >> 7986374

DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice differ in contextual fear but not auditory fear conditioning.

R Paylor1, R Tracy, J Wehner, J W Rudy.   

Abstract

It has been proposed that DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice perform differently on some learning and memory tasks because of functional differences in the hippocampal formation. To evaluate this hypothesis, DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice were tested on 2 forms of conditioned fear: contextual fear conditioning, which depends on the integrity of the hippocampal formation, and auditory cue conditioning, which does not. Both mouse strains displayed equivalent conditioning when the auditory cue was paired with shock, but DBA/2 mice showed significantly less conditioning to the context in which shock was experienced. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the pattern of spared and impaired performance, which DBA/2 mice display on a variety of learning and memory tasks, is related to impaired hippocampal formation function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7986374     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.108.4.810

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  74 in total

1.  Computer-assisted behavioral assessment of Pavlovian fear conditioning in mice.

Authors:  S G Anagnostaras; S A Josselyn; P W Frankland; A J Silva
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Regulation of learning by EphA receptors: a protein targeting study.

Authors:  R Gerlai; N Shinsky; A Shih; P Williams; J Winer; M Armanini; B Cairns; J Winslow; W Gao; H S Phillips
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Strain-dependent differences in LTP and hippocampus-dependent memory in inbred mice.

Authors:  P V Nguyen; T Abel; E R Kandel; R Bourtchouladze
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Sleep deprivation selectively impairs memory consolidation for contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Laurel A Graves; Elizabeth A Heller; Allan I Pack; Ted Abel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Comparison of the performance of DBA/2 and C57BL/6 mice in transitive inference and foreground and background contextual fear conditioning.

Authors:  Jessica M André; Kristy A Cordero; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Hippocampal lesion effects on occasion setting by contextual and discrete stimuli.

Authors:  Taejib Yoon; Lauren K Graham; Jeansok J Kim
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Differences in hippocampal CREB phosphorylation in trace fear conditioning of two inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Yoo Kyeong Hwang; Jae-Chun Song; Seol-Heui Han; Jeiwon Cho; Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Jung-Soo Han
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Acute ethanol has biphasic effects on short- and long-term memory in both foreground and background contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Danielle Gulick; Thomas J Gould
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Increased thresholds for long-term potentiation and contextual learning in mice lacking the NMDA-type glutamate receptor epsilon1 subunit.

Authors:  Y Kiyama; T Manabe; K Sakimura; F Kawakami; H Mori; M Mishina
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Selectively enhanced contextual fear conditioning in mice lacking the transcriptional regulator CCAAT/enhancer binding protein delta.

Authors:  E Sterneck; R Paylor; V Jackson-Lewis; M Libbey; S Przedborski; L Tessarollo; J N Crawley; P F Johnson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.