PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetization transfer contrast can differentiate acute from chronic lesions in multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Thirteen patients with multiple sclerosis and eight healthy patients were studied with MR using a 0.1-T system. Relatively T2-weighted spin-echo images were obtained without and with magnetization transfer contrast. The magnetization transfer effect of multiple sclerosis lesions was calculated and compared with the ages of the lesions. The magnetization transfer effect of normal-appearing white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis was calculated and compared with the magnetization transfer effect of white matter in healthy volunteers. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: White matter in the healthy volunteers had values from 0.40 to 0.45. Normal-appearing white matter in the patients with multiple sclerosis had magnetization transfer effect values ranging from 0.41 to 0.45. Multiple sclerosis plaques of less than 1 year's duration had magnetization transfer effect values ranging from 0.05 to 0.26; older plaques had values from 0.25 to 0.41. The difference in the distributions of these values for acute and chronic multiple sclerosis plaques is statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Current imaging modalities do not differentiate acute multiple sclerosis lesions from chronic ones. Our data on magnetization transfer show a statistically significant difference in magnetization transfer effect values between lesions of less than 1 year's duration and older lesions. The different values may correspond to the histologic changes of multiple sclerosis plaques over time. Magnetization transfer may be a reliable method for determining the age of multiple sclerosis lesions.
PURPOSE: To determine whether magnetization transfer contrast can differentiate acute from chronic lesions in multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Thirteen patients with multiple sclerosis and eight healthy patients were studied with MR using a 0.1-T system. Relatively T2-weighted spin-echo images were obtained without and with magnetization transfer contrast. The magnetization transfer effect of multiple sclerosis lesions was calculated and compared with the ages of the lesions. The magnetization transfer effect of normal-appearing white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis was calculated and compared with the magnetization transfer effect of white matter in healthy volunteers. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: White matter in the healthy volunteers had values from 0.40 to 0.45. Normal-appearing white matter in the patients with multiple sclerosis had magnetization transfer effect values ranging from 0.41 to 0.45. Multiple sclerosis plaques of less than 1 year's duration had magnetization transfer effect values ranging from 0.05 to 0.26; older plaques had values from 0.25 to 0.41. The difference in the distributions of these values for acute and chronic multiple sclerosis plaques is statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Current imaging modalities do not differentiate acute multiple sclerosis lesions from chronic ones. Our data on magnetization transfer show a statistically significant difference in magnetization transfer effect values between lesions of less than 1 year's duration and older lesions. The different values may correspond to the histologic changes of multiple sclerosis plaques over time. Magnetization transfer may be a reliable method for determining the age of multiple sclerosis lesions.
Authors: Madhan Kolappan; Andrew P D Henderson; Thomas M Jenkins; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Gordon T Plant; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller Journal: J Neurol Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Antônio J da Rocha; Acary S B Oliveira; Ricardo B Fonseca; Antônio C M Maia; Renata P Buainain; Henrique M Lederman Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.825