Literature DB >> 7983871

Long-term results of valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve.

S Aoyagi1, A Oryoji, Y Nishi, K Tanaka, K Kosuga, K Oishi.   

Abstract

Between 1980 and 1992, 908 patients underwent single aortic (n = 178), single mitral (n = 577), or double aortic and mitral (n = 153) valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical valve at our hospital. There were 392 male patients and 516 female patients whose ages ranged from 1.2 to 74 years (mean, 52 years). The early mortality rate was 5.0% (45 patients). A 94% complete follow-up was accomplished for 863 patients who were discharged from the hospital (4682.3 patient-years). Sixty-nine of these patients died, for a late mortality rate of 8.0%. Fifty-two patients, including four patients (0.3%/100 patient-years) had anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, 4(0.1%/100 patient-years) had prosthetic valve endocarditis, 11 (0.2%/100 patient-years) had nonstructural valve dysfunction, and 16 (0.3%/100 patient-years) underwent reoperation. There were no structural valve failures in this series. The total number of valve-related deaths was 22. Of those patients who survived, 98% were in New York Heart Association functional class I or II at the date of the last follow-up. The probabilities of freedom from thromboembolism and anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at 10 years were 94% +/- 2% and 97% +/- 2% in aortic valve replacement, 89% +/- 2% and 98% +/- 4% in mitral valve replacement, and 89% +/- 6% and 92% +/- 6% in double valve replacement, respectively. Significant hemolysis related to the St. Jude Medical valve occurred in 8 of the 577 patients who received mitral valve replacement in our early experience, and modifying the valve orientation appeared to play an important role in reducing hemolysis. The event-free rate, including all complications and late deaths, at 10 years was 75% +/- 7%, 74% +/- 3%, and 81% +/- 6% in aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement, and double valve replacement, respectively. On the basis of these results, the St. Jude Medical valve seems to be an excellent mechanical valve in terms of durability and low thrombogenicity and remains our prosthetic valve of choice when valve replacement with a mechanical valve is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7983871

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  10 in total

1.  Heart valve surgery in octogenarians: operative and long-term results.

Authors:  Shigeaki Aoyagi; Shuji Fukunaga; Koichi Arinaga; Hiroshi Tomoeda; Koji Akasu; Tomohiro Ueda
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract due to pannus formation after the implantation of a carbomedics aortic valve.

Authors:  Ken-ichi Imasaka; Masahiro Oe; Hironori Baba; Hitoshi Sumida
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-07

3.  St. Jude Medical prosthetic aortic valve malfunction due to pannus formation.

Authors:  Y Naito; M Hachida; T Shimabukuro; M Nonoyama; M Endo; H Koyanagi
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2000-11

4.  Twelve years of experience with the ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses.

Authors:  Shinichiro Taniguchi; Koji Hashizume; Tsuneo Ariyoshi; Yoichi Hisata; Kazuyoshi Tanigawa; Takashi Miura; Tomohiro Odate; Seiji Matsukuma; Shun Nakaji; Kiyoyuki Eishi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-07-06

5.  St. Jude prosthetic valve obstruction in the mitral position.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Matsuyama; Tomohiro Nakayama; Hiroaki Hagiwara
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-05-06

Review 6.  Beginning and development of surgery for acquired valvular heart disease in Japan.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hashimoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-11-12

7.  Comparison of outcomes after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve or a bioprosthesis using microsimulation.

Authors:  J P A Puvimanasinghe; J J M Takkenberg; M B Edwards; M J C Eijkemans; E W Steyerberg; L A Van Herwerden; K M Taylor; G L Grunkemeier; J D F Habbema; A J J C Bogers
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Left ventricular performance after aortic valve replacement in patients with low ejection fraction.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Tanoue; Yasuhisa Oishi; Hiromichi Sonoda; Takahiro Nishida; Atsuhiro Nakashima; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 9.  Valve-related complications after mechanical heart valve implantation.

Authors:  Yoshio Misawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Ten-year experience of tricuspid valve replacement with the St. Jude medical valve.

Authors:  Xiliang Zhu; Yi Luo; Eryong Zhang; Qi An; Xijun Xiao; Li Dong; Yingqiang Guo; Ke Dian; Zhong Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.