Literature DB >> 7982353

The development of memory and processing capacity.

G S Halford1, M T Maybery, A W O'Hare, P Grant.   

Abstract

The assumption of some developmental theories that short-term memory is the workspace of higher cognitive processes, and consequently that span measures processing capacity, is claimed to be inconsistent with the working memory literature. 4 experiments, using children aged 5 to 12 years, contrast this theory with a model in which short-term memory and the processing space component of working memory are at least partly distinct. Experiments 1 and 2 varied processing load, holding duration constant. The processing load manipulation had little effect on recall of a short-term memory preload. Experiments 3 and 4 failed to support the prediction that the greater processing efficiency of older children would be associated with slower loss of information from short-term memory. Although counting and rehearsal rates increased with age, and correlated with span, they did not predict the rate of loss of memory preload due to intervening counting. The data suggest that effects obtained with short-term memory span do not provide clear indications of overall working memory development, because short-term memory span and the processing space component of working memory entail distinct systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7982353     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00820.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  7 in total

1.  Dissociating retention and access in working memory: an age-comparative study of mental arithmetic.

Authors:  K Oberauer; A Demmrich; U Mayr; R Kliegl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  On the interpretation of working memory span in adults.

Authors:  J N Towse; G J Hitch; U Hutton
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-04

3.  Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences.

Authors:  Glenda Andrews; Damian Birney; Graeme S Halford
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

4.  Deficits in analogical reasoning in adolescents with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Daniel C Krawczyk; Gerri Hanten; Elisabeth A Wilde; Xiaoqi Li; Kathleen P Schnelle; Tricia L Merkley; Ana C Vasquez; Lori G Cook; Michelle McClelland; Sandra B Chapman; Harvey S Levin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Working memory capacity as a dynamic process.

Authors:  Vanessa R Simmering; Sammy Perone
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-07

6.  An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Daniel C Krawczyk; Michelle R Kandalaft; Nyaz Didehbani; Tandra T Allen; M Michelle McClelland; Carol A Tamminga; Sandra B Chapman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Assessing Complex Working Memory in Turkish-Speaking Children: The Listening Span Task Adaptation Into Turkish.

Authors:  Gülten Ünal; Duygu Özge; Theodoros Marinis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.