Literature DB >> 7981845

Jogging or walking--comparison of health effects.

E Suter1, B Marti, F Gutzwiller.   

Abstract

The present study compared the different health effects of 6 months' endurance training at two exercise intensities. Seventy-five nonsmoking, sedentary men were randomly assigned to either a home-based, unsupervised exercise program of 4 x 30 min/wk jogging at an intensity of 75% VO2max (n = 28), or of 6 x 30 min/wk walking at an intensity of 50% VO2max (n = 28), or to an inactive control group (n = 19). Exercise adherence and injuries related to exercise training as well as changes in endurance capacity, body fat, and serum lipids were assessed. After 6 months, joggers and walkers showed a similar increase in VO2max as measured by a maximal bicycle ergometer test (2.9 +/- 4.1 ml/kg min, P < 0.01 and 2.5 +/- 5.7 ml/kg min, P < 0.5, respectively). There were no significant changes in blood lipids in either group, although results revealed a significant association between the amount of training (i.e., kilometers exercised) and the increase in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) in joggers (Pearson's r = 0.42, P < 0.05). In walkers, a significant association between the amount of exercise and the decrease in sum of skinfolds and the waist-hip ratio was observed (Pearson's r = -0.48 and -0.45, P < 0.05 for both). The adherence rate was similar for both training groups with respect to the prescribed intervention goal with an average of 90 +/- 41 min/wk (joggers) and 121 +/- 72 min/wk (walkers) spent on endurance training.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7981845     DOI: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90072-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  13 in total

1.  If jogging is a joke, who should have the last laugh?

Authors:  P I Middleton
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Neuronal effects following working memory training.

Authors:  Martin Buschkuehl; Susanne M Jaeggi; John Jonides
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.464

3.  Walking and Non-HDL-C in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley; Zung Vu Tran
Journal:  Prev Cardiol       Date:  2005

4.  Characteristics of physical activity guidelines and their effect on adherence: a review of randomized trials.

Authors:  Ryan E Rhodes; Darren E R Warburton; Holly Murray
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training.

Authors:  Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl; John Jonides; Priti Shah
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Frequent attendance at religious services and mortality over 28 years.

Authors:  W J Strawbridge; R D Cohen; S J Shema; G A Kaplan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Effects of an 18 week walking programme on cardiac function in previously sedentary or relatively inactive adults.

Authors:  K Woolf-May; S Bird; A Owen
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 8.  Walking to health.

Authors:  J N Morris; A E Hardman
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Impaired mobility and impaired working capacity among foreign born people and native born Swedes.

Authors:  S Pudaric; J Sundquist; S E Johansson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  Home versus center based physical activity programs in older adults.

Authors:  N L Ashworth; K E Chad; E L Harrison; B A Reeder; S C Marshall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.