Literature DB >> 7981448

Comparison of estrogen and progesterone receptor status to lymphocyte immunity against tumor antigens in breast cancer patients.

R L Elliott1, J F Head, J L McCoy.   

Abstract

Estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) content of tumors were determined by both the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) cytosol and immunocytochemical assays (ICA), and these hormone receptor results were compared to lymphocyte immunity against tumor antigen(s) for 52 breast carcinoma patients. Hormone receptor analysis by both methods demonstrated that 60% of the patients' tumors had ERs, while 44% were positive for PgRs. The ICA procedure was more sensitive than the cytosol technique for determining PgR content of the tumors. This increased sensitivity was not observed for ER by ICA. Patient age, tumor size, and nodal status were not related to the ER and PgR receptor status. A total of 21/52 (40%) of the patients had positive lymphocyte immunity against tumor antigen. This immunity was independent of patient age, tumor size, and nodal status. There was no significant relationship between lymphocytic immunity against tumor antigen and ER or PgR content of tumors, suggesting that patient lymphocyte immunity against tumor is independent of hormone receptor status. This is further evidence that lymphocyte immunity against tumor antigen status is an independent prognostic indicator that may be useful in the selection of a subset of node negative patients for adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7981448     DOI: 10.1007/BF00665971

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  15 in total

1.  Cancer prognosis predicted by preoperative lymphocyte responsiveness in vitro.

Authors:  S M Watkins
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry.

Authors:  G M Clark; L G Dressler; M A Owens; G Pounds; T Oldaker; W L McGuire
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Assessment of immunologic competence and host reactivity against tumor antigens in breast cancer patients. Prognostic value and rationale of immunotherapy development.

Authors:  J F Head; F Wang; R L Elliott; J L McCoy
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1993-08-12       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Immunocytochemical estrogen and progestin receptor assays in breast cancer with monoclonal antibodies. Histopathologic, demographic, and biochemical correlations and relationship to endocrine response and survival.

Authors:  L P Pertschuk; D S Kim; K Nayer; J G Feldman; K B Eisenberg; A C Carter; Z T Rong; W L Thelmo; J Fleisher; G L Greene
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Immunocytochemical determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptor in breast cancer and relationship to prognosis.

Authors:  U Berger; R A McClelland; P Wilson; G L Greene; M R Haussler; J W Pike; K Colston; D Easton; R C Coombes
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene.

Authors:  D J Slamon; G M Clark; S G Wong; W J Levin; A Ullrich; W L McGuire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-01-09       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Improving the prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in breast cancer by combining DNA index and S-phase fraction. A proposed classification of DNA histograms in breast cancer.

Authors:  O P Kallioniemi; G Blanco; M Alavaikko; T Hietanen; J Mattila; K Lauslahti; M Lehtinen; T Koivula
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Relative worth of estrogen or progesterone receptor and pathologic characteristics of differentiation as indicators of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-06.

Authors:  B Fisher; C Redmond; E R Fisher; R Caplan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project: prognostic significance of erbB-2 protein overexpression in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  S Paik; R Hazan; E R Fisher; R E Sass; B Fisher; C Redmond; J Schlessinger; M E Lippman; C R King
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Association between high concentrations of Mr 52,000 cathepsin D and poor prognosis in primary human breast cancer.

Authors:  S M Thorpe; H Rochefort; M Garcia; G Freiss; I J Christensen; S Khalaf; F Paolucci; B Pau; B B Rasmussen; C Rose
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current status of autologous breast tumor cell-based vaccines.

Authors:  Samantha L Kurtz; Sruthi Ravindranathan; David A Zaharoff
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 5.217

2.  Neoadjuvant immunotherapy with chitosan and interleukin-12 to control breast cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Jimmy Ln Vo; Lirong Yang; Samantha L Kurtz; Sean G Smith; Bhanu Prasanth Koppolu; Sruthi Ravindranathan; David A Zaharoff
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 8.110

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.