Literature DB >> 7979583

Measurement of hand bone mineral content by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry: development of the method, and its application in normal volunteers and in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

A A Deodhar1, J Brabyn, P W Jones, M J Davis, A D Woolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To develop a method of measuring hand bone mineral content (BMC) by dual energy x ray absorptiometry (DXA); to apply this method of measuring hand BMC to normal volunteers to ascertain causes of variability; and to measure hand BMC in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of varying duration and severity. METHODS--The x ray beam of the Hologic QDR 1000 dual energy x ray absorptiometer was hardened by introducing a perspex-aluminium plate and the analysis software altered to allow for the small tissue bulk of the hand compared with the torso. Ninety five volunteers (46 men age 24-81 and 49 women age 20-83) had scans of both hands. Eight volunteers were assessed repeatedly to establish reproducibility and effect of hand position. Fifty six patients (22 men, 34 women, age range 25-86 years) with RA of differing duration and severity, had hand BMC measurement by DXA. RESULTS--The precision of BMC measurement was 2.3% with no additional variation due to hand position. Hand dominance had no significant effect on BMC. In men, hand BMC correlated with height (r = 0.57, p < 0.0001), weight (r = 0.58, p < 0.0001), forearm span (r = 0.5, p = 0.0006) and hand volume (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001). In women hand BMC correlated with height (r = 0.66, p < 0.0001), weight (r = 0.4, p = 0.003), forearm span (r = 0.3, p = 0.03) and hand volume (r = 0.49, p = 0.0008). After correcting for all these variables, male volunteers had significantly higher hand BMC than female volunteers (p = 0.01) and patients with RA had lower hand BMC than normal volunteers (total hand BMC in male volunteers 90.9 gms, 95% CI 86.9-95, in male patients 81.7 gms, 95% CI 73.7-89.6, p < 0.004, total hand BMC in female volunteers 62.2 gms 95% CI 59.8-64.5, female patients 52.3 gms, 95% CI 48.1-56.5, p < 0.005). In patients with RA, the hand BMC showed an inverse correlation with age (r = -0.44, p = 0.01), disease duration (r = -0.62, p = 0.0003), Larsen's grades (r = -0.62, p = 0.0002) and modified Sharp's method score (r = -0.69, p < 0.0001) in female patients only. CONCLUSIONS--A new, sensitive and reproducible technique of measurement of hand bone mineral content by DXA, has been developed and this method has been applied to normal volunteers and patients with RA. Hand dominance had no significant effect on hand BMC. After correcting for physical size, men have higher hand BMC than women. Hand BMC inversely correlates in women patients with disease duration and other validated methods of assessing radiological outcome in RA. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish its role in monitoring disease progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7979583      PMCID: PMC1005437          DOI: 10.1136/ard.53.10.685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  14 in total

1.  Early rheumatoid disease. I. Onset.

Authors:  A Fleming; J M Crown; M Corbett
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Use of the radiograph to measure the course of rheumatoid arthritis. The gold standard versus fool's gold.

Authors:  A C Brower
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1990-03

3.  Radiographic evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis and related conditions by standard reference films.

Authors:  A Larsen; K Dale; M Eek
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1977-07

4.  Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  D M Ritchie; J A Boyle; J M McInnes; M K Jasani; T G Dalakos; P Grieveson; W W Buchanan
Journal:  Q J Med       Date:  1968-07

5.  Assessment of radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  J F Fries; D A Bloch; J T Sharp; D J McShane; P Spitz; G B Bluhm; D Forrester; H Genant; P Gofton; S Richman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1986-01

6.  Long-term outcome of treating rheumatoid arthritis: results after 20 years.

Authors:  D L Scott; D P Symmons; B L Coulton; A J Popert
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-16       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales.

Authors:  R F Meenan; P M Gertman; J H Mason
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02

8.  Bone turnover in early rheumatoid arthritis. 2. Longitudinal bone density studies.

Authors:  P N Sambrook; B M Ansell; S Foster; J M Gumpel; R Hesp; J Reeve
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Are disease duration and degree of functional impairment determinants of bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis?

Authors:  O S Als; A Gotfredsen; B J Riis; C Christiansen
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Masud; S Langley; P Wiltshire; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17
View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  [Imaging techniques in rheumatology: conventional radiography in rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  R Rau; G Lingg; S Wassenberg; C Schorn; A Scherer
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 2.  Hand bone mass in rheumatoid arthritis: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Gamze Kilic; Salih Ozgocmen
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-18

Review 3.  Osteoporosis Pathophysiology, Epidemiology, and Screening in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Authors:  Giovanni Adami; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.592

4.  Assessment of phalangeal bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by quantitative ultrasound.

Authors:  P Röben; R Barkmann; S Ullrich; A Gause; M Heller; C C Glüer
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Hand bone loss in early undifferentiated arthritis: evaluating bone mineral density loss before the development of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  G Haugeberg; M J Green; M A Quinn; H Marzo-Ortega; S Proudman; Z Karim; R J Wakefield; P G Conaghan; S Stewart; P Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Is hand bone mineral density a marker for hand function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis? The correlation among bone mineral density of the hand, radiological findings and hand function.

Authors:  Beril Dogu; Banu Kuran; Figen Yilmaz; Ahmet Usen; Hulya Sirzai
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Measurement of periarticular bone mineral density in the hands of patients with early inflammatory arthritis using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Eithne Murphy; Barry Bresnihan; Oliver FitzGerald
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Hand bone densitometry: a more sensitive standard for the assessment of early bone damage in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Glenn Haugeberg; Michael J Green; Philip G Conaghan; Mark Quinn; Richard Wakefield; Susanna M Proudman; Sheena Stewart; Elizabeth Hensor; Paul Emery
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 19.103

9.  Bone loss in unclassified polyarthritis and early rheumatoid arthritis is better detected by digital x ray radiogrammetry than dual x ray absorptiometry: relationship with disease activity and radiographic outcome.

Authors:  T Jensen; M Klarlund; M Hansen; K E Jensen; J Pødenphant; T M Hansen; H Skjødt; L Hyldstrup
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Upper limb bone mineral density and body composition measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography in right-handed adults: the role of the dominance effect.

Authors:  G Sergi; E Perissinotto; M Zucchetto; G Enzi; E Manzato; S Giannini; F Bassetto; E M Inelmen; G Baldo; G Rinaldi; A Coin
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.