Literature DB >> 7978021

Duplex scanning replaces arteriography and operative exploration in the diagnosis of potential cervical vascular injury.

W R Fry1, J A Dort, R S Smith, D V Sayers, D J Morabito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pursuit of a diagnosis is more aggressive in suspected cervical vascular injury than in extremity vascular proximity injury, since the complications of missing the neck injury may result in irreversible neurologic damage. Most institutions use arteriography and operative exploration, but these modalities identify only 10% of cervical vascular traumas. While duplex scanning is the screening test of choice for carotid occlusive disease, few published reports have described experience with this modality in cervical vascular trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine if duplex scanning can replace arteriography or operative exploration as the initial screening modality in the assessment of potential cervical vascular trauma, we performed a prospective evaluation in two parts. First, we used duplex scanning and cervical arteriography, concomitantly, to rule out injury in 15 patients. We then used duplex scanning alone in 85 patients, reserving arteriography for cases in which the scan revealed an arterial injury.
RESULTS: Duplex scans and arteriography and operation diagnosed cervical vascular trauma equally well. Eight injuries were identified in all areas of the cervical arterial tree. No duplex scans have been falsely negative or falsely positive. Use of duplex scans instead of arteriography saved $1,252 per case.
CONCLUSIONS: Duplex scanning detects cervical vascular injuries as effectively as arteriography or operation, and is faster and less expensive. This approach expands the utility of diagnostic ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. It has become the procedure of choice for diagnosing cervical vascular trauma at our institution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7978021     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80147-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  6 in total

Review 1.  Penetrating injuries of the neck and the increasing role of CTA.

Authors:  Felipe Múnera; Jorge A Soto; Diego Nunez
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-05-27

Review 2.  Penetrating nontorso trauma: the head and the neck.

Authors:  Chad G Ball
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Penetrating Cervical Trauma. "Current Concepts in Penetrating Trauma", IATSIC Symposium, International Surgical Society, Helsinki, Finland, August 25-29, 2013.

Authors:  David V Feliciano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography.

Authors:  Walter L Biffl; Charles E Ray; Ernest E Moore; Reginald J Franciose; Somer Aly; Mary Grace Heyrosa; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon M Burch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome.

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; R K Ryu; P J Offner; Z Novak; D M Coldwell; R J Franciose; J M Burch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  State of the art: noninvasive imaging and management of neurovascular trauma.

Authors:  Charles E Ray; Shaun C Spalding; C Clay Cothren; Wei-Shin Wang; Ernest E Moore; Stephen P Johnson
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2007-01-09       Impact factor: 5.469

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.