BACKGROUND: The pursuit of a diagnosis is more aggressive in suspected cervical vascular injury than in extremity vascular proximity injury, since the complications of missing the neck injury may result in irreversible neurologic damage. Most institutions use arteriography and operative exploration, but these modalities identify only 10% of cervical vascular traumas. While duplex scanning is the screening test of choice for carotid occlusive disease, few published reports have described experience with this modality in cervical vascular trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine if duplex scanning can replace arteriography or operative exploration as the initial screening modality in the assessment of potential cervical vascular trauma, we performed a prospective evaluation in two parts. First, we used duplex scanning and cervical arteriography, concomitantly, to rule out injury in 15 patients. We then used duplex scanning alone in 85 patients, reserving arteriography for cases in which the scan revealed an arterial injury. RESULTS: Duplex scans and arteriography and operation diagnosed cervical vascular trauma equally well. Eight injuries were identified in all areas of the cervical arterial tree. No duplex scans have been falsely negative or falsely positive. Use of duplex scans instead of arteriography saved $1,252 per case. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex scanning detects cervical vascular injuries as effectively as arteriography or operation, and is faster and less expensive. This approach expands the utility of diagnostic ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients. It has become the procedure of choice for diagnosing cervical vascular trauma at our institution.
BACKGROUND: The pursuit of a diagnosis is more aggressive in suspected cervical vascular injury than in extremity vascular proximity injury, since the complications of missing the neck injury may result in irreversible neurologic damage. Most institutions use arteriography and operative exploration, but these modalities identify only 10% of cervical vascular traumas. While duplex scanning is the screening test of choice for carotid occlusive disease, few published reports have described experience with this modality in cervical vascular trauma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To determine if duplex scanning can replace arteriography or operative exploration as the initial screening modality in the assessment of potential cervical vascular trauma, we performed a prospective evaluation in two parts. First, we used duplex scanning and cervical arteriography, concomitantly, to rule out injury in 15 patients. We then used duplex scanning alone in 85 patients, reserving arteriography for cases in which the scan revealed an arterial injury. RESULTS: Duplex scans and arteriography and operation diagnosed cervical vascular trauma equally well. Eight injuries were identified in all areas of the cervical arterial tree. No duplex scans have been falsely negative or falsely positive. Use of duplex scans instead of arteriography saved $1,252 per case. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex scanning detects cervical vascular injuries as effectively as arteriography or operation, and is faster and less expensive. This approach expands the utility of diagnostic ultrasound in the evaluation of traumapatients. It has become the procedure of choice for diagnosing cervical vascular trauma at our institution.
Authors: Walter L Biffl; Charles E Ray; Ernest E Moore; Reginald J Franciose; Somer Aly; Mary Grace Heyrosa; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon M Burch Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: W L Biffl; E E Moore; R K Ryu; P J Offner; Z Novak; D M Coldwell; R J Franciose; J M Burch Journal: Ann Surg Date: 1998-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Charles E Ray; Shaun C Spalding; C Clay Cothren; Wei-Shin Wang; Ernest E Moore; Stephen P Johnson Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2007-01-09 Impact factor: 5.469