Literature DB >> 11981216

Treatment-related outcomes from blunt cerebrovascular injuries: importance of routine follow-up arteriography.

Walter L Biffl1, Charles E Ray, Ernest E Moore, Reginald J Franciose, Somer Aly, Mary Grace Heyrosa, Jeffrey L Johnson, Jon M Burch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of routine follow-up arteriography on the management and outcome of patients with acute blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: During the past 5 years there has been increasing recognition of BCVI, but the management of these lesions remains controversial. The authors previously proposed a grading system for BCVI, with grade-specific management guidelines. The authors have noted that a significant number of injuries evolve within 7 to 10 days, warranting alterations in therapy.
METHODS: A prospective database of a regional trauma center's experience with BCVI has been maintained since 1990. A policy of arteriographic screening for BCVI based on injury mechanism (e.g., cervical hyperextension) and injury patterns (e.g., cervical and facial fractures) was instituted in 1996. A grading system was devised to develop management protocols: I = intimal irregularity; II = dissection/flap/thrombus; III = pseudoaneurysm; IV = occlusion; V = transection.
RESULTS: From June 1990 to October 2001, 171 patients (115 male, age 36 +/- 1 years) were diagnosed with BCVI. Mean injury severity score was 28 +/- 1; associated injuries included brain (57%), spine (44%), chest (43%), and face (34%). Mechanism was motor vehicle crash in 50%, fall in 11%, pedestrian struck in 11%, and other in 29%. One hundred fourteen patients had 157 carotid artery injuries (43 bilateral), and 79 patients had 97 vertebral artery injuries (18 bilateral). The breakdown of injury grades was 137 grade I, 52 grade II, 32 grade III, 25 grade IV, and 8 grade V. One hundred fourteen (73%) carotid and 65 (67%) vertebral arteries were restudied with arteriography 7 to 10 days after the injury. Eight-two percent of grade IV and 93% of grade III injuries were unchanged. However, grade I and II lesions changed frequently. Fifty-seven percent of grade I and 8% of grade II injuries healed, allowing cessation of therapy, whereas 8% of grade I and 43% of grade II lesions progressed to pseudoaneurysm formation, prompting interventional treatment. There was no significant difference in healing or in progression of injuries whether treated with heparin or antiplatelet therapy or untreated. However, heparin may improve the neurologic outcome in patients with ischemic deficits and may prevent stroke in asymptomatic patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine follow-up arteriography is warranted in patients with grade I and II BCVIs because most of these patients (61% in this series) will require a change in management. A prospective randomized trial will be necessary to identify the optimal treatment of BCVI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11981216      PMCID: PMC1422496          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200205000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

1.  Traumatic carotid artery dissection: a significant incidental finding.

Authors:  K M Hughes; B Collier; K A Greene; S Kurek
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 0.688

2.  Blunt carotid artery injuries.

Authors:  A A Parikh; F A Luchette; J F Valente; R C Johnson; G L Anderson; J Blebea; G J Rosenthal; J M Hurst; J A Johannigman; K Davis
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Blunt vascular injuries of the head and neck: is heparinization necessary?

Authors:  S R Eachempati; S N Vaslef; M W Sebastian; R L Reed
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-12

Review 4.  Detection of vertebral artery injury after cervical spine trauma using magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  S J Weller; E Rossitch; A M Malek
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-04

5.  Computed tomographic angiography as a screening modality for blunt cervical arterial injuries: preliminary results.

Authors:  F B Rogers; E F Baker; T M Osler; S R Shackford; S L Wald; P Vieco
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-03

6.  Blunt carotid arterial injuries: implications of a new grading scale.

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; P J Offner; K E Brega; R J Franciose; J M Burch
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-11

7.  Optimizing screening for blunt cerebrovascular injuries.

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; P J Offner; K E Brega; R J Franciose; J P Elliott; J M Burch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Vertebral artery occlusion associated with cervical spine trauma. A prospective analysis.

Authors:  F B Giacobetti; A R Vaccaro; M A Bos-Giacobetti; D M Deeley; T J Albert; J C Farmer; J M Cotler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  The devastating potential of blunt vertebral arterial injuries.

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; J P Elliott; C Ray; P J Offner; R J Franciose; K E Brega; J M Burch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The unrecognized epidemic of blunt carotid arterial injuries: early diagnosis improves neurologic outcome.

Authors:  W L Biffl; E E Moore; R K Ryu; P J Offner; Z Novak; D M Coldwell; R J Franciose; J M Burch
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  MR imaging of acute cervical spinal ligamentous and soft tissue trauma.

Authors:  Sathish Kumar Dundamadappa; Keith A Cauley
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-03-08

2.  Blunt carotid injury from a penetrating stick: an unexpected injury.

Authors:  S M Wijeyaratne; C Weerasinghe; M R N Cassim
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2010-07-21

3.  A 57-Year-Old Man With Headache, Numbness, and Weakness.

Authors:  Sam Snider; Shamik Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2017-02-08

4.  Head and neck neurovascular trauma: Clinical and angiographic correlation.

Authors:  Peter Kato Ssenyonga; David Le Feuvre; Allan Taylor
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.610

5.  Endovascular management of neurovascular arterial injuries in the face and neck.

Authors:  Martin G Radvany; Philippe Gailloud
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Blunt vertebral vascular injury in trauma patients: ATLS® recommendations and review of current evidence.

Authors:  Roozbeh Shafafy; Sukrit Suresh; John O Afolayan; Alexander R Vaccaro; Jaykar R Panchmatia
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

7.  Endovascular repair of traumatic cervical internal carotid artery injuries: a safe and effective treatment option.

Authors:  R Seth; A M Obuchowski; G H Zoarski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.

Authors:  David K Stone; Vyas T Viswanathan; Christina A Wilson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.081

9.  Evaluation of the criteria for angiotomography indications in the diagnosis of carotid and vertebral arterial injury associated with blunt trauma.

Authors:  Goulart Gladstone; Porta Maria Pereira Rina; Poggetti Sérgio Renato; Fontes Belchor; Júnior Lourenço de Souza Almerindo; Gattas Gabriel; Birolini Dario
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Treatment Practices and Outcomes After Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in Children.

Authors:  Michael C Dewan; Vijay M Ravindra; Stephen Gannon; Colin T Prather; George L Yang; Lori C Jordan; David Limbrick; Andrew Jea; Jay Riva-Cambrin; Robert P Naftel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.