Literature DB >> 7977341

Interactive effect of two candidate genes in a disease: extension of the marker-association-segregation chi(2) method.

M H Dizier1, M C Babron, F Clerget-Darpoux.   

Abstract

For elucidating the genetic component of multifactorial diseases, it is important to investigate the effect of several factors and the possible interaction between them. In particular, for many diseases it is interesting to study the interactive effect of two genes. In this context, the marker-association-segregation chi 2 method (MASC), initially proposed to detect the involvement of a candidate gene in multifactorial diseases, is developed here to investigate the involvement of two candidate genes and to model the joint effect of these two genes. In particular, it is possible to precisely determine whether the joint effect of both genes is multiplicative. This extension simultaneously uses information on two markers, one for each candidate gene, at both the population and the familial segregation level. We show here that there can be an important gai of power to detect the effect of a second gene in a disease when information is used simultaneously on two markers instead of studying each marker separately. This extension of MASC is then applied on a sample of insulin-dependent diabetes (IDD) families typed for the markers of two candidate regions: HLA and that of the insulin gene (INS). This analysis allows us to confirm the involvement of INS in IDD, and the best-fitting model is a multiplicative (noninteractive) effect of HLA and INS, with a biallelic locus for INS and a complementation model for HLA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977341      PMCID: PMC1918330     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  19 in total

1.  A new method to test genetic models in HLA associated diseases: the MASC method.

Authors:  F Clerget-Darpoux; M C Babron; B Prum; G M Lathrop; I Deschamps; J Hors
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  Discrimination between genetic models for insulin dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  F Clerget-Darpoux; M H Dizier; C Bonaïti-Pellié; M C Babron; J Hochez; M Martinez
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol Suppl       Date:  1986

3.  Two-disease locus model: sib pair method using information on both HLA and Gm.

Authors:  M H Dizier; F Clerget-Darpoux
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Polymorphic DNA region adjacent to the 5' end of the human insulin gene.

Authors:  G I Bell; J H Karam; W J Rutter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Segregation analysis incorporating linkage markers. I. Single-locus models with an application to type I diabetes.

Authors:  N Risch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Bias of the estimated recombination fraction and lod score due to an association between a disease gene and a marker gene.

Authors:  F Clerget-Darpoux
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  A polymorphic locus near the human insulin gene is associated with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  G I Bell; S Horita; J H Karam
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 9.461

8.  Insulin gene region-encoded susceptibility to type 1 diabetes is not restricted to HLA-DR4-positive individuals.

Authors:  S C Bain; J B Prins; C M Hearne; N R Rodrigues; B R Rowe; L E Pritchard; R J Ritchie; J R Hall; D E Undlien; K S Ronningen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes and a highly variable locus close to the insulin gene on chromosome 11.

Authors:  G A Hitman; A C Tarn; R M Winter; V Drummond; L G Williams; N I Jowett; G F Bottazzo; D J Galton
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  HLA and insulin-dependent diabetes: an overview.

Authors:  A Svejgaard; L P Ryder
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.135

View more
  9 in total

1.  Multilocus linkage tests based on affected relative pairs.

Authors:  H J Cordell; G C Wedig; K B Jacobs; R C Elston
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-21       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A perspective on epistasis: limits of models displaying no main effect.

Authors:  Robert Culverhouse; Brian K Suarez; Jennifer Lin; Theodore Reich
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-01-08       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  From markers to molecular mechanisms: type 1 diabetes in the post-GWAS era.

Authors:  Alan G Baxter; Margaret A Jordan
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2012-12-28

Review 4.  The genetics of complex ophthalmic disorders.

Authors:  K Evans; A C Bird
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Optimal strategies for mapping complex diseases in the presence of multiple loci.

Authors:  D E Goldgar; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Two-locus maximum lod score analysis of a multifactorial trait: joint consideration of IDDM2 and IDDM4 with IDDM1 in type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  H J Cordell; J A Todd; S T Bennett; Y Kawaguchi; M Farrall
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Reproductive failure and the major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  K Jin; H N Ho; T P Speed; T J Gill
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Genetic analysis of type 1 diabetes using whole genome approaches.

Authors:  J A Todd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-09-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Joint effects of HLA, INS, PTPN22 and CTLA4 genes on the risk of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  M Bjørnvold; D E Undlien; G Joner; K Dahl-Jørgensen; P R Njølstad; H E Akselsen; K Gervin; K S Rønningen; L C Stene
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 10.122

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.