Literature DB >> 7977059

Utility and safety of immediate exercise testing of low-risk patients admitted to the hospital for suspected acute myocardial infarction.

W R Lewis1, E A Amsterdam.   

Abstract

More than 2 million patients are admitted to U.S. hospitals annually for clinical suspicion of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and > 70% are found not to have had a cardiac event. This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of immediate exercise testing for patients admitted to the hospital for suspected AMI. Ninety-three nonconsecutive low-risk patients admitted to the hospital from the emergency department to rule out AMI underwent exercise treadmill testing using a modified Bruce protocol immediately on admission to the hospital (median time < 1 hour). Twelve patients had positive exercise electrocardiograms, 6 of whom had significant coronary narrowing by angiography. An uncomplicated non-Q-wave AMI was diagnosed in 1 patient. Fifty-nine patients had negative and 22 patients had nondiagnostic exercise electrocardiograms. Of these 81 patients, 44 were discharged immediately after exercise testing, 17 were discharged within 24 hours, and 20 were discharged after 24 hours of observation. There were no complications from exercise testing. There were 2 late noncardiac deaths and 1 late AMI. Thus, immediate exercise testing of low-risk patients with chest pain who are at sufficient risk to be designated for hospital admission is effective in further stratifying this group into those who can be safely discharged immediately and those who require hospitalization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7977059     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90845-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Can acute rest imaging shorten evaluation in chest pain centers?

Authors:  F J Wackers
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Should exercise treadmill testing be provided in the emergency department?

Authors:  J Arnold; S Goodacre
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.740

3.  Risk stratification of patients with acute chest pain and normal troponin concentrations.

Authors:  J Sanchis; V Bodí; A Llácer; J Núñez; L Consuegra; M J Bosch; V Bertomeu; V Ruiz; F J Chorro
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Ezra A Amsterdam; J Douglas Kirk; David A Bluemke; Deborah Diercks; Michael E Farkouh; J Lee Garvey; Michael C Kontos; James McCord; Todd D Miller; Anthony Morise; L Kristin Newby; Frederick L Ruberg; Kristine Anne Scordo; Paul D Thompson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Critical pathways for patients with acute chest pain at low risk.

Authors:  Kirsten E Fleischmann; Lee Goldman; Paula A Johnson; Richard A Krasuski; J Stephen Bohan; L Howard Hartley; Thomas H Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain.

Authors:  S Goodacre; N Calvert
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Efficacy of coronary revascularization in patients with acute chest pain managed in a chest pain unit.

Authors:  Juan Sanchis; Vicent Bodí; Julio Núñez; Luis Mainar; Eduardo Núñez; Pilar Merlos; Eva Rúmiz; Gema Miñana; Xavier Bosch; Angel Llácer
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 7.616

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.