Literature DB >> 7975334

Visual suppression and its effect upon color and luminance sensitivity.

T L Ooi1, M S Loop.   

Abstract

Psychophysical increment thresholds were compared for periods of phenomenological dominance or suppression produced by different stimulation of the two eyes. Three experimental procedures were used; binocular rivalry, permanent suppression and flash suppression. The amount of suppression produced by each procedure was evaluated under conditions intended to accentuate color or luminance system contribution to the detection of a spectral flash. All three procedures resulted in a different pattern of color and luminance suppression. Binocular rivalry suppressed color sensitivity more than luminance and within color, blue (439 nm) sensitivity was more suppressed than red (613 nm). Permanent suppression resulted in a similar pattern of suppression but only blue color sensitivity was reliably more suppressed than luminance sensitivity. Flash suppression produced distinctly different results such that blue color sensitivity was reliably less suppressed than luminance or red color sensitivity, which were not different from each other. Taken together these results provide clues as to where and when the physiological processes mediating visual suppression may be found in the nervous system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7975334     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90272-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Revealing boundary-contour based surface representation through the time course of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The magnitude and dynamics of interocular suppression affected by monocular boundary contour and conflicting local features.

Authors:  Yong R Su; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  I Agree: Binocular Rivalry Stimuli are Common but Rivalry is Not.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Binocular Rivalry Stimuli are Common but Rivalry is not.

Authors:  Robert Paul O'Shea
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Effect of Interocular Contrast Difference on Stereopsis in Observers With Sensory Eye Dominance.

Authors:  Chao Han; Zijiang J He; Teng Leng Ooi
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Conflict defined by global gestalt can modulate binocular rivalry suppression.

Authors:  Jan W Brascamp; Parker Cuthbert; Sam Ling
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Temporal analysis of image-rivalry suppression.

Authors:  Rishi Bhardwaj; Robert P O'Shea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.