Literature DB >> 7975284

Stimulus discriminability in visual search.

P Verghese1, K Nakayama.   

Abstract

We measured the probability of detecting the target in a visual search task, as a function of the following parameters: the discriminability of the target from the distractors, the duration of the display, and the number of elements in the display. We examined the relation between these parameters at criterion performance (80% correct) to determine if the parameters traded off according to the predictions of a limited capacity model. For the three dimensions that we studied, orientation, color, and spatial frequency, the observed relationship between the parameters deviates significantly from a limited capacity model. The data relating discriminability to display duration are better than predicted over the entire range of orientation and color differences that we examined, and are consistent with the prediction for only a limited range of spatial frequency differences--from 12 to 23%. The relation between discriminability and number varies considerably across the three dimensions and is better than the limited capacity prediction for two of the three dimensions that we studied. Orientation discrimination shows a strong number effect, color discrimination shows almost no effect, and spatial frequency discrimination shows an intermediate effect. The different trading relationships in each dimension are more consistent with early filtering in that dimension, than with a common limited capacity stage. Our results indicate that higher-level processes that group elements together also play a strong role. Our experiments provide little support for limited capacity mechanisms over the range of stimulus differences that we examined in three different dimensions.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7975284     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)90289-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  21 in total

1.  The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  B McElree; M Carrasco
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Characterizing visual performance fields: effects of transient covert attention, spatial frequency, eccentricity, task and set size.

Authors:  M Carrasco; C P Talgar; E L Cameron
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2001

3.  Vertical meridian asymmetry in spatial resolution: visual and attentional factors.

Authors:  Cigdem P Talgar; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

4.  How important is lateral masking in visual search?

Authors:  A H Wertheim; I T C Hooge; K Krikke; A Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attention speeds processing across eccentricity: feature and conjunction searches.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco; Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Interocular transfer in perceptual learning of a pop-out discrimination task.

Authors:  A A Schoups; G A Orban
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Cube search, revisited.

Authors:  Xuetao Zhang; Jie Huang; Serap Yigit-Elliott; Ruth Rosenholtz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Contrast discrimination, non-uniform patterns and change blindness.

Authors:  K C Scott-Brown; H S Orbach
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1998-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Reaction time distributions constrain models of visual search.

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Evan M Palmer; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.