Literature DB >> 7974105

Adhesions after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A comparison of extra versus intra peritoneal placement of a polypropylene mesh in an animal model.

S E Attwood1, M T Caldwell, P Marks, M McDermott, R B Stephens.   

Abstract

Prosthetic mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has become popular but the method of its placement is controversial. Mesh placed within the peritoneum may cause adhesion formation and further complications. The aim of this study was to examine the laparoscopic placement of a mesh, comparing intraperitoneal vs extraperitoneal insertion. In a porcine model (n = 15) a polypropylene mesh was placed laparoscopically over the anterior abdominal wall. On the left side the mesh was stapled on the parietal peritoneum. On the right side the peritoneum was incised, an extraperitoneal space was dissected, the mesh was inserted, and the peritoneum was closed over it. The animals were maintained for 2 weeks. At postmortem there were adhesions in two of those placed extraperitoneally and five of those placed intraperitoneally (P = 0.19, Fisher's exact test). The adhesions comprised fibrous peritoneal bands to loops of small intestine. Both methods of laparoscopic mesh placement were associated with a small but significant incidence of adhesion formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7974105     DOI: 10.1007/BF00593439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects--an experimental study.

Authors:  N W Law; H Ellis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  An anatomic and functional classification for the diagnosis and treatment of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  A I Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 3.  Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  C J Filipi; R J Fitzgibbons; G M Salerno; R O Hart
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Laparoscopic hernia repair: a preliminary report.

Authors:  D M Sailors; T S Layman; R P Burns; K E Chandler; W L Russell
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Management of groin hernias by laparoscopy.

Authors:  R Ger; A Mishrick; J Hurwitz; C Romero; R Oddsen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias using a totally extraperitoneal prosthetic approach.

Authors:  J B McKernan; H L Laws
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair without peritoneal incision. Technique and early clinical results.

Authors:  E H Phillips; B J Carroll; M J Fallas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Complications of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  B V MacFadyen; M E Arregui; J D Corbitt; C J Filipi; R J Fitzgibbons; M E Franklin; J B McKernan; D O Olsen; E H Phillips; D Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Inguinal hernia repair using local anaesthesia.

Authors:  F Glassow
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The cutaneous nerves encountered during laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: new anatomical findings for the surgeon.

Authors:  R J Rosenberger; H Loeweneck; G Meyer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative evaluation of adhesions to intraperitoneally placed fixation materials: a laparoscopic study in rats: adhesions to fixation materials.

Authors:  Bulent Gungor; Zafer Malazgirt; Koray Topgül; Ali Gök; Mehmet Bilgin; Savaş Yürüker
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 0.656

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.