Literature DB >> 7973981

Lumbar intervertebral disc transfer. A canine study.

S L Frick1, E N Hanley, R A Meyer, W K Ramp, T M Chapman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Degenerative lumbar disc disease has been implicated as a cause of low back pain. Current treatment options for low back pain involve nonphysiologic fusion of the involved segments and have variable success rates. This is an experimental study of lumbar intervertebral disc transplantation using a canine surgical model.
OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the feasibility of lumbar disc transplantation and its effects on disc metabolism and morphology.
METHOD: Eight mature mongrel dogs underwent disc transfer surgeries, in which the L2-L3 and L4-L5 intervertebral discs, with a small segment of adjacent superior and inferior vertebral body, were removed and transposed. The transplanted disc were stabilized by plates or by a flexible cable wire construct using Songer cables (DANEK, Inc., Memphis, TN). Unrestricted activity was allowed postoperatively. At 4 months, the spines were harvested, and the transplanted discs were evaluated biochemically and histologically. Intervening nontransplanted discs served as viable controls and thrice-frozen discs served as nonviable controls. Cell viability was assessed by measuring proteoglycan synthesis and DNA content.
RESULTS: Proteoglycan synthesis (35S uptake normalized to DNA content) was maintained in transplanted anulus fibrosus tissue, but was decreased in nucleus pulposus samples (P < 0.05). DNA content was not altered significantly in the transplanted discs. Histologic analysis of the transplanted discs showed revascularization and remodeling of the bone adjacent to the disc and preservation of the lamellar architecture of the anulus fibrosus. The transplanted nucleus pulposus samples had chondrocyte-like cells present, but the staining characteristics of the nucleus material was variable. The contour of the transplanted disc endplates was irregular in all specimens.
CONCLUSIONS: The structure and function of autograft intervertebral discs were maintained after disc transfer surgery; the transplant discs, however, were not completely normal in either their morphology or their metabolic functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7973981     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199408150-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  9 in total

Review 1.  Intervertebral disc transplantation: a biological approach to motion preservation.

Authors:  Keith D K Luk; D K Ruan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The notochord: structure and functions.

Authors:  Diana Corallo; Valeria Trapani; Paolo Bonaldo
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Multiscale and multimodal structure-function analysis of intervertebral disc degeneration in a rabbit model.

Authors:  B G Ashinsky; S E Gullbrand; E D Bonnevie; S A Mandalapu; C Wang; D M Elliott; L Han; R L Mauck; H E Smith
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 4.  Proper animal experimental designs for preclinical research of biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration.

Authors:  Yizhong Peng; Xiangcheng Qing; Hongyang Shu; Shuo Tian; Wenbo Yang; Songfeng Chen; Hui Lin; Xiao Lv; Lei Zhao; Xi Chen; Feifei Pu; Donghua Huang; Xu Cao; Zengwu Shao
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-06-28

5.  Cytomorphology of notochordal and chondrocytic cells from the nucleus pulposus: a species comparison.

Authors:  Christopher J Hunter; John R Matyas; Neil A Duncan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  Role of biomechanics in intervertebral disc degeneration and regenerative therapies: what needs repairing in the disc and what are promising biomaterials for its repair?

Authors:  James C Iatridis; Steven B Nicoll; Arthur J Michalek; Benjamin A Walter; Michelle S Gupta
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  Tissue engineering and the intervertebral disc: the challenges.

Authors:  Rita Kandel; Sally Roberts; Jill P G Urban
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Investigating the possibility of intervertebral disc regeneration induced by granulocyte colony stimulating factor-stimulated stem cells in rats.

Authors:  Wen-Ching Tzaan; Hsien-Chih Chen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2010-11-21

Review 9.  Adipose stem cells for intervertebral disc regeneration: current status and concepts for the future.

Authors:  R J W Hoogendoorn; Z F Lu; R J Kroeze; R A Bank; P I Wuisman; M N Helder
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2008-02-24       Impact factor: 5.310

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.