Literature DB >> 7973770

Measuring quality of life: an emerging science.

C M Moinpour1.   

Abstract

Quality of life (QOL) variables are increasingly included as end points in cancer therapy trials, supplementing such traditional end points as survival time in evaluating the effects of cancer treatments. Consensus has been reached that a number of QOL components (symptom status and physical, emotional, role, and social functioning) should be measured. Assessing multiple health-related QOL dimensions, as compared with a global score, provides a more detailed accounting of specific effects of cancer treatment on patient functioning. Southwest Oncology Group QOL assessment policies emphasize patient reports and the need for systematic quality control procedures. The Southwest Oncology Group QOL questionnaire comprises a battery of categorical scales with established psychometric properties. A set of generic core scales is always included in the battery, and treatment- and disease-specific scales are developed for each trial. Other frequently used QOL questionnaires, such as the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, the Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System questionnaire, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy are alternative instruments in current use. Quality of life findings from lung cancer clinical trials indicate a prevalence of symptom distress, fatigue, and decline in functional status, although patients also experience symptom management problems without treatment. A summary of preliminary QOL findings for two vinorelbine (Navelbine; Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC; Pierre Fabre Médicament, Paris, France) trials (randomized and single-arm) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer show that symptom status was as good or better for patients receiving vinorelbine compared with those receiving 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in the randomized study. Differences in other QOL dimensions were not detected. Findings for the single-arm trial of oral vinorelbine were generally consistent with those of the randomized trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7973770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  12 in total

1.  Oncologists' use of quality of life information: results of a survey of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group physicians.

Authors:  A Bezjak; P Ng; R Skeel; A D Depetrillo; R Comis; K M Taylor
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Quality of life after radiofrequency ablation combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone.

Authors:  Yan-Bin Wang; Min-Hua Chen; Kun Yan; Wei Yang; Ying Dai; Shan-Shan Yin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Assessment and data analysis of health-related quality of life in clinical trials for gastric cancer treatments.

Authors:  Satoshi Morita; Adrian A Kaptein; Akira Tsuburaya; Yasuhiro Kodera; Takanori Matsui; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Personalized surgery for rectal tumours: the patient's opinion counts.

Authors:  R A Audisio; A Filiberti; J G Geraghty; B Andreoni
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Assessing quality of life in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: development of a new instrument for use in multiple settings.

Authors:  R B Giesler; B J Miles; M E Cowen; M W Kattan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Quality of life changes in patients undergoing treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Wei-Chu Chie; Fang Yu; Mengqian Li; Lorena Baccaglini; Jane M Blazeby; Chin-Fu Hsiao; Herng-Chia Chiu; Ronnie T Poon; Naoko Mikoshiba; Gillian Al-Kadhimi; Nigel Heaton; Jozer Calara; Peter Collins; Katharine Caddick; Anna Costantini; Valerie Vilgrain; Chieh Chiang
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 7.  The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30.

Authors:  M T King
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  Quality of life and hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Shipra Gandhi; Sapna Khubchandani; Renuka Iyer
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-08

9.  How quality of life data contribute to our understanding of cancer patients' experiences? A study of patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri; Robert Milroy; David Hole; James McEwen; Charles R Gillis
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Impact of surgery on quality of life in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Mise; Shouichi Satou; Takeaki Ishizawa; Junichi Kaneko; Taku Aoki; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.