Literature DB >> 7968850

Automatic three-dimensional correlation of CT-CT, CT-MRI, and CT-SPECT using chamfer matching.

M van Herk1, H M Kooy.   

Abstract

Image correlation is often required to utilize the complementary information in CT, MRI, and SPECT. A practical method for automatic image correlation in three-dimensions (3D) based on chamfer matching is described. The method starts with automatic extraction of contour points in one modality and automatic segmentation of the corresponding feature in the other modality. A distance transform is applied to the segmented volume and a cost function is defined that operates between the contour points and the distance transform. Matching is performed by iteratively optimizing the cost function for 3D translation, rotation, and scaling of the contour points. The complete matching process including segmentation requires no user interaction and takes about 100 s on an HP715/50 workstation. Perturbation tests on clinical data with cost functions based on mean, rms, and maximum distances in combination with two general purpose optimization procedures have been performed. The performance of the methods has been quantified in terms of accuracy, capture range, and reliability. The best results on clinical data are obtained with the cost function based on the mean distance and the simplex optimization method. The accuracy is 0.3 mm for CT-CT, 1.0 mm for CT-MRI, and 0.7 mm for CT-SPECT correlation of the head. The accuracy is usually at subpixel level but is limited by global geometric distortions, e.g., for CT-MRI correlation. Both for CT-CT and CT-MRI correlation the capture range is about 6 cm, which is higher than normal differences in patient setup found on the scanners (less than 4 cm). This means that the correlation procedure seldom fails (better than 98% reliability) and user interaction is unnecessary. For CT-SPECT matching the capture range is about 3 cm (80% reliability), and must be further improved. The method has already been introduced in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7968850     DOI: 10.1118/1.597344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  27 in total

1.  Integrated volume visualization of functional image data and anatomical surfaces using normal fusion.

Authors:  R Stokking; K J Zuiderveld; M A Viergever
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Computer-aided navigation in neurosurgery.

Authors:  P Grunert; K Darabi; J Espinosa; R Filippi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  An imaging co-registration system using novel non-invasive and non-radioactive external markers.

Authors:  Tung-Hsin Wu; Jiunn-Kuen Wang; Jason J S Lee; Ren-Shyan Liu; Wan-Yuo Guo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Multisection CT venography of the dural sinuses and cerebral veins by using matched mask bone elimination.

Authors:  Charles B L M Majoie; Marcel van Straten; Henk W Venema; Gerard J den Heeten
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Quality and accuracy of cone beam computed tomography gated by active breathing control.

Authors:  Bria P Thompson; Geoffrey D Hugo
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Technical note: deformable image registration on partially matched images for radiotherapy applications.

Authors:  Deshan Yang; S Murty Goddu; Wei Lu; Olga L Pechenaya; Yu Wu; Joseph O Deasy; Issam El Naqa; Daniel A Low
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Demonstration of a reduction in muscarinic receptor binding in early Alzheimer's disease using iodine-123 dexetimide single-photon emission tomography.

Authors:  J J Claus; E A Dubois; J Booij; J Habraken; J C de Munck; M van Herk; B Verbeeten; E A van Royen
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1997-06

8.  Three- to five-dimensional biomedical multisensor imaging for the assessment of neurological (dys) function.

Authors:  L M Bidaut; R Pascual-Marqui; J Delavelle; A Naimi; M Seeck; C Michel; D Slosman; O Ratib; D Ruefenacht; T Landis; N de Tribolet; J R Scherrer; F Terrier
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 9.  MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges.

Authors:  Amir M Owrangi; Peter B Greer; Carri K Glide-Hurst
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  A fast inverse consistent deformable image registration method based on symmetric optical flow computation.

Authors:  Deshan Yang; Hua Li; Daniel A Low; Joseph O Deasy; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.