Literature DB >> 7967558

Speaker race identification from acoustic cues in the vocal signal.

J H Walton1, R F Orlikoff.   

Abstract

One-second acoustic samples were extracted from the mid-portion of sustained /a/ vowels produced by 50 black and 50 white adult males. Each vowel sample from a black subject was randomly paired with a sample from a white subject. From the tape-recorded samples alone, both expert and naive listeners could determine the race of the speaker with 60% accuracy. The accuracy of race identification was independent of the listener's own race, sex, or listening experience. An acoustic analysis of the samples revealed that, although within ranges reported by previous studies of normal voices, the black speakers had greater frequency perturbation, significantly greater amplitude perturbation, and a significantly lower harmonics-to-noise ratio than did the white speakers. The listeners were most successful in distinguishing voice pairs when the differences in vocal perturbation and additive noise were greatest and were least successful when such differences were minimal or absent. Because there were no significant differences in the mean fundamental frequency or formant structure of the voice samples, it is likely that the listeners relied on differences in spectral noise to discriminate the black and white speakers.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7967558     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3704.738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  12 in total

1.  Learning to recognize talkers from natural, sinewave, and reversed speech samples.

Authors:  Sonya M Sheffert; David B Pisoni; Jennifer M Fellowes; Robert E Remez
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Acoustic analysis of voice using WPCVox: a comparative study with Multi Dimensional Voice Program.

Authors:  Juan Ignacio Godino-Llorente; Víctor Osma-Ruiz; Nicolás Sáenz-Lechón; Ignacio Cobeta-Marco; Ramón González-Herranz; Carlos Ramírez-Calvo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Judgments of self-identified gay and heterosexual male speakers: Which phonemes are most salient in determining sexual orientation?

Authors:  Erik C Tracy; Sierra A Bainter; Nicholas P Satariano
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2015-09

4.  Talker identification across source mechanisms: experiments with laryngeal and electrolarynx speech.

Authors:  Tyler K Perrachione; Cara E Stepp; Robert E Hillman; Patrick C M Wong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Developmental craniofacial anthropometry: Assessment of race effects.

Authors:  Reid B Durtschi; Dongjun Chung; Lindell R Gentry; Moo K Chung; Houri K Vorperian
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Sounding Black or White: priming identity and biracial speech.

Authors:  Sarah E Gaither; Ariel M Cohen-Goldberg; Calvin L Gidney; Keith B Maddox; Calvin L Gidney; Calvin L Gidney
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

7.  Development of the Arabic Voice Pathology Database and Its Evaluation by Using Speech Features and Machine Learning Algorithms.

Authors:  Tamer A Mesallam; Mohamed Farahat; Khalid H Malki; Mansour Alsulaiman; Zulfiqar Ali; Ahmed Al-Nasheri; Ghulam Muhammad
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Telling Friend from Foe: Listeners Are Unable to Identify In-Group and Out-Group Members from Heard Laughter.

Authors:  Marie Ritter; Disa A Sauter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-11-16

9.  Towards a more nuanced view of vocal attractiveness.

Authors:  Molly Babel; Grant McGuire; Joseph King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The role of motivation and cultural dialects in the in-group advantage for emotional vocalizations.

Authors:  Disa A Sauter
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.