Literature DB >> 7964955

Altered etoposide pharmacokinetics and time to engraftment in pediatric patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplantation.

J H Rodman1, D J Murry, T Madden, V M Santana.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the pharmacokinetics and clinical response of high-dose etoposide in combination with carboplatin for pediatric cancer patients undergoing autologous bone marrow transplant. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pharmacokinetic parameters for etoposide were determined at doses of 960, 1,200, and 1,500 mg/m2 when given with high-dose carboplatin and followed by autologous marrow rescue. Twenty-nine patients (age 1.6 to 23 years) with refractory or relapsed solid tumors were studied. Etoposide was administered in three divided doses as a 6-hour infusion on alternate days with carboplatin. Etoposide concentrations (n = 14) were determined during and following each of three doses. Patient characteristics, drug dose, and pharmacokinetic parameters were examined as predictors of marrow engraftment as reflected by recovery of granulocytes and platelets.
RESULTS: The median values for clearance (Cl) and terminal half-life (T1/2 beta) of etoposide were 14.3 mL/min/m2 (range, 6.8 to 29.6) and 5.9 hours (range, 3.7 to 39). After adjustment for body size, Cl and volume of distribution did not correlate with any laboratory parameter or patient characteristic. However, seven patients who received concomitant anticonvulsant therapy had significantly higher (P < .01) average etoposide Cl values (23.7 mL/min/m2) than 22 patients who did not receive drugs known to alter hepatic metabolism (13.4 mL/min/m2). The median etoposide Cl value in patients who received concurrent carboplatin but no anticonvulsant agents is substantially lower than values previously reported in either children or adults. Higher etoposide concentrations were significantly associated with longer times to recovery of granulocyte and platelet counts.
CONCLUSION: Etoposide Cl is significantly higher in patients who receive concomitant anticonvulsant therapy, which is consistent with clinically important hepatic enzyme induction. The lower etoposide Cl associated with high-dose carboplatin suggests that carboplatin may impair etoposide metabolism. Furthermore, high etoposide concentrations appeared to prolong time to recovery of hematopoietic function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964955     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.11.2390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in oncology.

Authors:  H L McLeod
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Etoposide-loaded immunoliposomes as active targeting agents for GD2-positive malignancies.

Authors:  Brandon S Brown; Tariq Patanam; Keyan Mobli; Christian Celia; Peter E Zage; Andrew J Bean; Ennio Tasciotti
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Randomized cross-over clinical trial to study potential pharmacokinetic interactions between cisplatin or carboplatin and etoposide.

Authors:  Huw D Thomas; David J Porter; Imke Bartelink; Joy R Nobbs; Michael Cole; Suzie Elliott; David R Newell; A Hilary Calvert; Martin Highley; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Christine M Hartford; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Adaptive control methods for the dose individualisation of anticancer agents.

Authors:  A Rousseau; P Marquet; J Debord; C Sabot; G Lachâtre
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with carbamazepine. An update.

Authors:  E Spina; F Pisani; E Perucca
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Drug interactions in childhood cancer.

Authors:  Cyrine Haidar; Sima Jeha
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Management of epilepsy in brain tumors.

Authors:  Marta Maschio; Umberto Aguglia; Giuliano Avanzini; Paola Banfi; Carla Buttinelli; Giuseppe Capovilla; Marina Maria Luisa Casazza; Gabriella Colicchio; Antonietta Coppola; Cinzia Costa; Filippo Dainese; Ornella Daniele; Roberto De Simone; Marica Eoli; Sara Gasparini; Anna Teresa Giallonardo; Angela La Neve; Andrea Maialetti; Oriano Mecarelli; Marta Melis; Roberto Michelucci; Francesco Paladin; Giada Pauletto; Marta Piccioli; Stefano Quadri; Federica Ranzato; Rosario Rossi; Andrea Salmaggi; Riccardo Terenzi; Paolo Tisei; Flavio Villani; Paolo Vitali; Lucina Carla Vivalda; Gaetano Zaccara; Alessia Zarabla; Ettore Beghi
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetic optimisation of treatment with oral etoposide.

Authors:  Giuseppe Toffoli; Giuseppe Corona; Barbara Basso; Mauro Boiocchi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Antineoplastic agents. Drug interactions of clinical significance.

Authors:  E van Meerten; J Verweij; J H Schellens
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.