Literature DB >> 7964940

Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term results of 1,143 patients from a single institution.

H Zincke1, E J Bergstralh, M L Blute, R P Myers, D M Barrett, M M Lieber, S K Martin, J E Oesterling.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and complication rate of radical prostatectomy (RP) as a treatment option for clinically localized prostate cancer (clinical stage < or = T2c).
METHODS: The study was a retrospective analysis of 1,143 consecutive patients (median age, 64 years; range, 38 to 79 y) who underwent RP at one institution (mean follow-up time, 9.7 years). Complications for this study population were compared with those of a contemporary group of 1,000 consecutive patients.
RESULTS: Of 1,143 patients, 83 (7%) had a low clinical stage (T1) and 160 (14%) had a low histologic grade (Gleason score < or = 3); 648 (57%) had a high clinical stage (T2b or T2c) and 204 (18%) had a high histologic grade (Gleason score > or = 7). Only 113 (10%) died of prostate cancer, and 177 (15%) developed metastasis. Adjuvant treatment (androgen deprivation or radiation therapy) was given in 197 (17%) patients (> or = pT3) and provided virtually identical results as without adjuvant treatment. The 10- and 15-year crude survival rates for 1,143 patients were 75% +/- 1.5% (SE) and 60% +/- 2.2%, respectively; the cause-specific survival rates were 90% +/- 1.1% and 83% +/- 1.9%, respectively; and the metastasis-free survival rates were 83% +/- 1.3% and 77% +/- 1.9%, respectively (398 men at risk at 10 years and 138 men at risk at 15 years). The 10-year survival rate for patients with Gleason score > or = 7 was 74% +/- 3.9%. Only tumor grade was a significant predictor for disease outcome. The hospital mortality rate decreased from 0.7% for the 1,143 study patients to 0% for the more recent 1,000 patients. Severe incontinence declined to 1.4% for the more recent 1,000 patients. Most patients who underwent RP were healthy (Charlson comorbidity index).
CONCLUSION: Survival at 15 years was similar to the expected survival rate. Current morbidity and mortality rates associated with RP were extremely low. Thus, RP has been a viable management option for men with clinically localized prostate cancer who have a life expectancy of more than 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7964940     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.11.2254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  23 in total

Review 1.  Critical comparison of laparoscopic, robotic, and open radical prostatectomy: techniques, outcomes, and cost.

Authors:  Matthew T Gettman; Michael L Blute
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Blood storage duration and biochemical recurrence of cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Juan P Cata; Eric A Klein; Gerald A Hoeltge; Jarrod E Dalton; Edward Mascha; Jerome O'Hara; Amanda Russell; Andrea Kurz; Shamgar Ben-Elihayhu; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Comparison of oncological outcomes between retropubic radical prostatectomy and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis stratified by surgical experience.

Authors:  Jinsung Park; Dae-Seon Yoo; Cheryn Song; Sahyun Park; Sejun Park; Seong Cheol Kim; Yongmee Cho; Hanjong Ahn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Boris Fischer; Nadja Engel; Jean-Luc Fehr; Hubert John
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Localized prostate cancer: early intervention or expectant therapy?

Authors:  T R Griffiths; D E Neal
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Circulating MicroRNA as Biomarkers: An Update in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Anvesha Srivastava; Simeng Suy; Sean P Collins; Deepak Kumar
Journal:  Mol Cell Pharmacol       Date:  2011

7.  The influence of extent of surgical margin positivity on prostate specific antigen recurrence.

Authors:  R E Emerson; M O Koch; T D Jones; J K Daggy; B E Juliar; L Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Information of prostate biopsy positive core: does it affect MR detection of prostate cancer on using 3T-MRI?

Authors:  Rika Yoshida; Yasushi Kaji; Yukihisa Tamaki; Takashi Katsube; Hajime Kitagaki; Tsunehito Kanbara; Takao Kamai
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Tissue specific and androgen-regulated expression of human prostate-specific transglutaminase.

Authors:  H J Dubbink; N S Verkaik; P W Faber; J Trapman; F H Schröder; J C Romijn
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

10.  Multilevel Factors Associated With Overall Mortality for Men Diagnosed With Prostate Cancer in Florida.

Authors:  Hong Xiao; Fei Tan; Pierre Goovaerts; Askal Ali; Georges Adunlin; Clement K Gwede; Youjie Huang
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2013-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.