OBJECTIVE: We report the development and validation of an MDS-based cognitive index, the MDS Cognition Scale (MDS-COGS), by evaluating it against two popular dementia rating scales, the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). DESIGN: A Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred nursing home residents. MEASUREMENTS: Each study participant was assessed on the GDS and the MMSE by trained medical students. At the same time, but independent of the medical students, a geriatric nurse completed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) instrument on each participant. MAIN RESULTS: The Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), a categorical measure of cognition that uses MDS items, was compared with the GDS in 133 subjects, using a split-sample technique. The GDS was found to be more appropriate as a 4-stage than a 7-stage scale, with GDS stages 1-4 acting as a single stage. The CPS showed very poor percent agreement with GDS stages 5 and 7 (50% or less) and, therefore, was revised by adding other MDS predictors. The new instrument, designated MDS-COGS, is a 0-10 point scale generated from eight MDS cognitive items. The MDS-COGS was then validated against the 4-stage GDS and MMSE in the remaining 67 nursing home residents. Chance-corrected agreement (kappa) between the MDS-COGS and GDS in the 67 subjects was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.70, 0.88), and percent agreement with GDS stages 5 and 7 was 60% and 85%, respectively. The MDS-COGS was also demonstrated to be a valid measure of cognitive impairment as defined by the MMSE, with sensitivity, specificity, chance-corrected agreement (kappa), and area under the ROC curve, all above 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The MDS Cognition Scale, the MDS-COGS, provides a valid measure of the presence and severity of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents using items from the Minimum Data Set.
OBJECTIVE: We report the development and validation of an MDS-based cognitive index, the MDS Cognition Scale (MDS-COGS), by evaluating it against two popular dementia rating scales, the Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). DESIGN: A Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred nursing home residents. MEASUREMENTS: Each study participant was assessed on the GDS and the MMSE by trained medical students. At the same time, but independent of the medical students, a geriatric nurse completed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) instrument on each participant. MAIN RESULTS: The Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), a categorical measure of cognition that uses MDS items, was compared with the GDS in 133 subjects, using a split-sample technique. The GDS was found to be more appropriate as a 4-stage than a 7-stage scale, with GDS stages 1-4 acting as a single stage. The CPS showed very poor percent agreement with GDS stages 5 and 7 (50% or less) and, therefore, was revised by adding other MDS predictors. The new instrument, designated MDS-COGS, is a 0-10 point scale generated from eight MDS cognitive items. The MDS-COGS was then validated against the 4-stage GDS and MMSE in the remaining 67 nursing home residents. Chance-corrected agreement (kappa) between the MDS-COGS and GDS in the 67 subjects was 0.80 (95% CI = 0.70, 0.88), and percent agreement with GDS stages 5 and 7 was 60% and 85%, respectively. The MDS-COGS was also demonstrated to be a valid measure of cognitive impairment as defined by the MMSE, with sensitivity, specificity, chance-corrected agreement (kappa), and area under the ROC curve, all above 0.80. CONCLUSIONS: The MDS Cognition Scale, the MDS-COGS, provides a valid measure of the presence and severity of cognitive impairment in nursing home residents using items from the Minimum Data Set.
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Christine A Nelson; Nancy A Perrin; Alvin H Moss; Bernard J Hammes; Susan W Tolle Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Nina R Joyce; Thomas G McGuire; Stephen J Bartels; Susan L Mitchell; David C Grabowski Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Lauren W Cohen; Sheryl Zimmerman; David Reed; Philip D Sloane; Anna S Beeber; Tiffany Washington; John G Cagle; Lisa P Gwyther Journal: J Appl Gerontol Date: 2013-10-16
Authors: Xi Chen; Sheryl Zimmerman; Guy G Potter; Philip D Sloane; Lauren W Cohen; David Reed Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Rosa Liperoti; Graziano Onder; Francesco Landi; Kate L Lapane; Vincent Mor; Roberto Bernabei; Giovanni Gambassi Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Kaycee M Sink; Joseph Thomas; Huiping Xu; Bruce Craig; Steven Kritchevsky; Laura P Sands Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: André Hajek; Christian Brettschneider; Annette Ernst; Tina Posselt; Birgitt Wiese; Jana Prokein; Siegfried Weyerer; Jochen Werle; Angela Fuchs; Michael Pentzek; Janine Stein; Steffi G Riedel-Heller; Horst Bickel; Edelgard Mösch; Kathrin Heser; Frank Jessen; Wolfgang Maier; Martin Scherer; Hans-Helmut König Journal: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 4.328
Authors: Vishal Bali; Michael L Johnson; Hua Chen; Marc L Fleming; Holly M Holmes; Rajender R Aparasu Journal: Ann Pharmacother Date: 2015-11-25 Impact factor: 3.154