Literature DB >> 7963026

Loudness growth in forward masking: relation to intensity discrimination.

F G Zeng1.   

Abstract

The growth of loudness of a tone burst following an intense forward masker was measured as a function of the tone level. The level of the forward-masked tone was adjusted to balance the loudness of a standard tone presented without a forward masker, using a 2AFC, double-staircase, tracking procedure. The forward masker was a 90-dB SPL, 100-ms, 1000-Hz pure tone. The standard tone and the masked tone were both 25-ms, 1000-Hz pure tones. The forward masker and the masked tone were always presented in the first interval. With a 100-ms delay between them, there was little or no threshold elevation for the masked tone. However, the masker caused the masked tone to sound louder than it would if it had not been masked, a phenomenon termed "loudness enhancement" [Irwin and Zwislocki, Percept. Psychophys. 10, 189-192 (1971); Galambos et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1127-1130 (1972)]. In addition, the present results show a nonmonotonic enhancement function that the forward masker introduced a 10-16-dB enhancement effect for tones of 40-65 dB SPL and no significant effect for the 30 and 90 dB SPL tones. The loudness variability in forward masking was estimated from the upper and lower sequences tracking the 21% and the 79% louder response levels on the psychometric function, respectively. The variability demonstrated a similar nonmonotonic function. In forward masking loudness grows more steeply at low-medium sensation levels, and merges with normal growth at high levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7963026     DOI: 10.1121/1.410154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  3 in total

1.  Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-04

2.  Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study.

Authors:  Irina Schierholz; Mareike Finke; Andrej Kral; Andreas Büchner; Stefan Rach; Thomas Lenarz; Reinhard Dengler; Pascale Sandmann
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Temporal feature perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lydia Timm; Deepashri Agrawal; Filipa C Viola; Pascale Sandmann; Stefan Debener; Andreas Büchner; Reinhard Dengler; Matthias Wittfoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.