Literature DB >> 7962021

Sagittal measurements of the cervical spine in subaxial fractures and dislocations. An analysis of two hundred and eighty-eight patients with and without neurological deficits.

J D Kang1, M P Figgie, H H Bohlman.   

Abstract

We analyzed three factors involved in fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine and their relation to the degree of injury of the spinal cord. The three factors were the space available for the spinal cord at the level of the injury, the sagittal diameter of the spinal canal at the uninjured levels, and the Pavlov ratio at the uninjured levels. Of the 288 patients analyzed, eighty-three had a complete injury of the spinal cord, ninety-two had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, thirty had an isolated nerve-root injury, and eighty-three had no neurological deficit. The mean space available for the spinal cord at the level of the injury was 10.5 millimeters for the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord, 13.1 millimeters for those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, 15.9 millimeters for those who had an isolated nerve-root injury, and 16.7 millimeters for those who had no neurological deficit. The difference between the groups was significant (p < 0.001) except for the difference between the patients who had an isolated nerve-root injury and those who had no neurological deficit. The mean sagittal diameter of the canal at the uninjured levels was 16.1 millimeters for the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord, 16.1 millimeters for those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, 17.9 millimeters for those who had an isolated nerve-root injury, and 18.1 millimeters for those who had no neurological deficit. The difference between the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord and those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord and that between the patients who had an isolated nerve-root injury and those who had no neurological deficit were not significant (p > 0.05). However, the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord and those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord were significantly different from the patients who had an isolated nerve-root injury and those who had no neurological deficit (p < 0.001). The mean Pavlov ratio at the uninjured levels was 0.82 for the patients who had a complete injury of the spinal cord, 0.84 for those who had an incomplete injury of the spinal cord, 0.96 for those who had an isolated nerve-root injury, and 0.96 for those who had no neurological deficit.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7962021     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199411000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  24 in total

1.  Defining hyoplasia of the atlas: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Michael P Kelly; Yasushi Oshima; Jin S Yeom; Rashmi Agarwal; Navkirat S Bajwa; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Comparison of inter- and intra-observer reliability among the three classification systems for cervical spinal canal stenosis.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko; Wonkee Choi; Seungbum Chae
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Establishment of parameters for congenital stenosis of the cervical spine: an anatomic descriptive analysis of 1,066 cadaveric specimens.

Authors:  Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Ernest Y Young; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Variation of C1 spinolaminar line and prevalence of C1 stenosis in normal population.

Authors:  Sombat Kunakornsawat; Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn; Pritsanai Pruttikul; Chaiwat Piyasakulkaew; Kanthika Wasinpongwanich; Piyabuth Kittithamvongs
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-03-03

5.  A practical radiographic visual estimation technique for the prediction of developmental narrowing of cervical spinal canal.

Authors:  Erdem Toslak Iclal; Laurie M Lomasney; Nathaniel S Jones; Bartosz Wojewnik; Amany Aziz; Khalid Alsabban; William Adams
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Spinal movement and dural sac compression during airway management in a cadaveric model with atlanto-occipital instability.

Authors:  Shiyao Liao; Niko R E Schneider; Frank Weilbacher; Anne Stehr; Stefan Matschke; Paul A Grützner; Erik Popp; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical facet dislocations in the adolescent population: a report of 21 cases at a Level 1 trauma center from 2004 to 2014.

Authors:  Alireza K Anissipour; Julie Agel; Carlo Bellabarba; Richard J Bransford
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  The pathomechanics, pathophysiology and prevention of cervical spinal cord and brachial plexus injuries in athletics.

Authors:  Simon Chao; Marisa J Pacella; Joseph S Torg
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Cervical spondylosis with spinal cord encroachment: should preventive surgery be recommended?

Authors:  Donald R Murphy; Christopher M Coulis; Jonathan K Gerrard
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2009-08-24

10.  The relationship between spinal stenosis and neurological outcome in traumatic cervical spine injury: an analysis using Pavlov's ratio, spinal cord area, and spinal canal area.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Byung-Wan Choi; Sul-Jun Kim; Gyu-Hyung Kim; Young-Shin Kim; Ji-Hun Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2009-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.