Literature DB >> 29502319

Variation of C1 spinolaminar line and prevalence of C1 stenosis in normal population.

Sombat Kunakornsawat1, Tinnakorn Pluemvitayaporn1, Pritsanai Pruttikul1, Chaiwat Piyasakulkaew1, Kanthika Wasinpongwanich1,2, Piyabuth Kittithamvongs3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The variation of C1 spinolaminar line in normal population is not fully understood. The relative position of C1 lamina to C3-C2 spinolaminar line is reported as good screening tool for determination of C1 canal stenosis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the variation of C1 spinolaminar line and find the prevalence of C1 canal stenosis in normal population using C3-C2 spinolaminar test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and fifteen lateral cervical radiographs from 315 volunteers without neurological symptoms were analyzed. The relative position of C1 spinolaminar line was determined by C3-C2 spinolaminar and considered positive if C1 lamina lay ventral to C3-C2 line. C1 space available for cord (SAC) was measured from posterior border of dens to the C1 lamina to determine the sagittal diameter.
RESULTS: The mean sagittal spinal canal diameter of C1 was 22.2 mm (13-26 mm). Of 315, 14 (4.4%) had positive, 184 (58.4%) had neutral, and 117 (37.1%) had negative C1 spinolaminar line in relation to C3-C2 line. The mean SAC among positive group was 14.9 mm compared to neutral and negative groups which were 22.2 and 23.3 mm, respectively. 21.4% of positive group had SAC of less than 12 mm. The 92.8% of positive C1 spinolaminar line was found in age ≥ 60 years.
CONCLUSION: In a normal population, 4.4% has positive C1 spinolaminar line. The C1 stenosis is more prevalent in positive C1 spinolaminar line group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atlas; Prevalence; Space available for cord; Spinolaminar line; Stenosis; Variation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29502319     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-018-2159-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  14 in total

1.  The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  E E PAYNE; J D SPILLANE
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 2.  Cervical myelopathy and congenital stenosis from hypoplasia of the atlas: report of three cases and literature review.

Authors:  K Nishikawa; S C Ludwig; R J Colón; Y Fujimoto; J G Heller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Marked canal stenosis at the level of the atlas.

Authors:  H Sawada; I Akiguchi; H Fukuyama; M Kameyama; T Koyama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Quantitative analysis of the cervical spinal canal by computed tomography.

Authors:  J H Stanley; S I Schabel; G D Frey; G D Hungerford
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Sagittal diameter of the cervical canal in normal Indian adults.

Authors:  S K Gupta; R C Roy; A Srivastava
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.350

6.  Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up.

Authors:  D R Gore
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. A long-term analysis with predictors of paralysis and recovery.

Authors:  S D Boden; L D Dodge; H H Bohlman; G R Rechtine
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Cervical myelopathy accompanied with hypoplasia of the posterior arch of the atlas: case report.

Authors:  Yoshiro Musha; Kazuhiro Mizutani
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2009-05

9.  Atlas hypoplasia as a cause of high cervical myelopathy. Case report.

Authors:  Y Komatsu; T Shibata; S Yasuda; Y Ono; T Nose
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Spinolaminar Line Test as a Screening Tool for C1 Stenosis.

Authors:  Yasushi Oshima; Michael P Kelly; Kwang-Sup Song; Moon Soo Park; Tapanut Chuntarapas; Katie D Vo; Jin S Yeom; Katsushi Takeshita; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.