Literature DB >> 7958586

Ambulatory or self blood pressure measurement? Improving the diagnosis of hypertension.

M J Aylett.   

Abstract

There are major problems with blood pressure (BP) measurement that must be addressed in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Errors in taking BP are widespread and failure to allow for regression to the norm often leads to premature treatment. 'White coat hypertension', a condition in which raised BP levels in the presence of a doctor or nurse do not regress towards the norm on repeated measurement, may be responsible for between 10-20% of our patients being given medication unnecessarily. Ambulatory measurement is becoming an accepted method of attempting to deal with these problems whereas self measurement at home is little used. Used properly, both methods prevent most observer error and bias, eliminate regression to the norm, and allow the diagnosis of 'white coat hypertension'. Both curtail the period necessary to establish patients' 'true' BP. Ambulatory measurement has established scientific advantages but is expensive in time, equipment and staffing. Home measurement at the moment is less reliable but is easier and cheaper. Problems with the accuracy of instruments for home measurement can be solved and, even in their present form, enable the diagnosis of white coat hypertension and help in the diagnosis of many hypertensive patients. Ambulatory monitoring is already undergoing trials in primary care. It is suggested that home measurement should also be more widely used where most patients with hypertension are exclusively managed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7958586     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/11.2.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  7 in total

1.  Pressure for change: unresolved issues in blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  M Aylett
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a guide for general practitioners.

Authors:  N Prasad; C Isles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-12-14

Review 3.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: from old concepts to novel insights.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Kultigin Turkmen; Tevfik Ecder; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  A series of self-measurements by the patient is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure measurement.

Authors:  M M Brueren; H J Schouten; P W de Leeuw; G A van Montfrans; J W van Ree
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure.

Authors:  Paul Little; Jane Barnett; Lucy Barnsley; Jean Marjoram; Alex Fitzgerald-Barron; David Mant
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-03

6.  A cross-sectional survey and service evaluation of simple telehealth in primary care: what do patients think?

Authors:  Elizabeth Cottrell; Kate McMillan; Ruth Chambers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Diagnostic value and cost-benefit analysis of 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in primary care in Portugal.

Authors:  Paulo Pessanha; Manuel Viana; Paula Ferreira; Susana Bertoquini; Jorge Polónia
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.298

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.