Literature DB >> 7957054

A nucleosome precludes binding of the transcription factor Pho4 in vivo to a critical target site in the PHO5 promoter.

U Venter1, J Svaren, J Schmitz, A Schmid, W Hörz.   

Abstract

Activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PHO5 gene by phosphate starvation is accompanied by the disappearance of two pairs of positioned nucleosomes that flank a short hypersensitive region in the promoter. The transcription factor Pho4 is the key regulator of this transition. By in vitro footprinting it was previously shown that there is a low affinity site (UASp1) which is contained in the short hypersensitive region in the inactive promoter, and a high affinity site (UASp2) which is located in the adjacent nucleosome. To investigate the interplay between nucleosomes and Pho4, we have performed in vivo footprinting experiments with dimethylsulfate. Pho4 was found to bind to both sites in the active promoter. In contrast, it binds to neither site in the repressed promoter. Lack of binding under repressing conditions is largely due to the low affinity of Pho4 for its binding sites under these conditions. Despite the increased affinity of Pho4 for its target sites under activating conditions, binding to UASp2 is prevented by the presence of the nucleosome and can only occur after prior disruption of this nucleosome in a process that requires UASp1. Protection of the PHO5 UASp2 by the nucleosome is not absolute, however, since overexpression of Pho4 can disrupt this nucleosome even when UASp1 is deleted. Also under these conditions, with only UASp2 present, all four nucleosomes at the PHO5 promoter are disrupted, whereas no chromatin change at all is observed when both UAS elements are destroyed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7957054      PMCID: PMC395424          DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06811.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  47 in total

1.  Uncoupling gene activity from chromatin structure: promoter mutations can inactivate transcription of the yeast HSP82 gene without eliminating nucleosome-free regions.

Authors:  M S Lee; W T Garrard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The transcriptionally-active MMTV promoter is depleted of histone H1.

Authors:  E H Bresnick; M Bustin; V Marsaud; H Richard-Foy; G L Hager
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 3.  Control of globin gene transcription.

Authors:  T Evans; G Felsenfeld; M Reitman
Journal:  Annu Rev Cell Biol       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Chromatin as an essential part of the transcriptional mechanism.

Authors:  G Felsenfeld
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-01-16       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Transactivation functions facilitate the disruption of chromatin structure by estrogen receptor derivatives in vivo.

Authors:  T A Pham; Y P Hwung; D P McDonnell; B W O'Malley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-09-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  Irresistible force meets immovable object: transcription and the nucleosome.

Authors:  R D Kornberg; Y Lorch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1991-11-29       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Role of trans-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  K D Fascher; J Schmitz; W Hörz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Coordinate genetic control of yeast fatty acid synthase genes FAS1 and FAS2 by an upstream activation site common to genes involved in membrane lipid biosynthesis.

Authors:  H J Schüller; A Hahn; F Tröster; A Schütz; E Schweizer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Glucocorticoids are required for establishment and maintenance of an alteration in chromatin structure: induction leads to a reversible disruption of nucleosomes over an enhancer.

Authors:  A Reik; G Schütz; A F Stewart
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  A functional role for nucleosomes in the repression of a yeast promoter.

Authors:  C Straka; W Hörz
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  55 in total

1.  Targeted histone acetylation and altered nuclease accessibility over short regions of the pea plastocyanin gene.

Authors:  Y L Chua; A P Brown; J C Gray
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 2.  Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms.

Authors:  M E Massari; C Murre
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  The GATA factor AreA is essential for chromatin remodelling in a eukaryotic bidirectional promoter.

Authors:  M I Muro-Pastor; R Gonzalez; J Strauss; F Narendja; C Scazzocchio
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  An in vitro system recapitulates chromatin remodeling at the PHO5 promoter.

Authors:  E S Haswell; E K O'Shea
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Differential nuclease sensitivity profiling of chromatin reveals biochemical footprints coupled to gene expression and functional DNA elements in maize.

Authors:  Daniel L Vera; Thelma F Madzima; Jonathan D Labonne; Mohammad P Alam; Gregg G Hoffman; S B Girimurugan; Jinfeng Zhang; Karen M McGinnis; Jonathan H Dennis; Hank W Bass
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  Identification of mouse histone deacetylase 1 as a growth factor-inducible gene.

Authors:  S Bartl; J Taplick; G Lagger; H Khier; K Kuchler; C Seiser
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Affinity purification of specific chromatin segments from chromosomal loci in yeast.

Authors:  Joachim Griesenbeck; Hinrich Boeger; J Seth Strattan; Roger D Kornberg
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Targeted cytosine methylation for in vivo detection of protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Christopher D Carvin; Archana Dhasarathy; Laurie B Friesenhahn; Walter J Jessen; Michael P Kladde
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  In vitro reconstitution of PHO5 promoter chromatin remodeling points to a role for activator-nucleosome competition in vivo.

Authors:  Franziska Ertel; A Barbara Dirac-Svejstrup; Christina Bech Hertel; Dorothea Blaschke; Jesper Q Svejstrup; Philipp Korber
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Nucleosomes are translationally positioned on the active allele and rotationally positioned on the inactive allele of the HPRT promoter.

Authors:  C Chen; T P Yang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.