Literature DB >> 7956521

The results of a multicenter Italian study on the use of the Gamma nail for the treatment of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: a review of 1181 cases.

S Boriani1, F De Iure, G Bettelli, L Specchia, P Bungaro, G Montanari, A Capelli, P Canella, R Regnoli, C Triscari.   

Abstract

A total of 1147 pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, 10 delays in consolidation and non-union, 24 pathologic fractures and osteolysis with the risk of fracture, treated with a gamma nail in 17 Italian departments of traumatology, were collected. In 70% of the patients weight-bearing was allowed during the first week postsurgery; 77% of the patients followed-up recovered the same ability to walk that had preceded trauma. Complications included intraoperative (1.8%) and postoperative (1.1%) diaphyseal fractures, cephalic screw cut out (2.2%), and breakage of the nail (0.4%). There were two cases of infection (0.3%). Most of the complications were related to errors in technique. The safest procedure is constituted by the choice of a nail with a thinner caliber, 2 mm diaphyseal over-reaming, insertion of the nail without the use of a hammer, and distal locking; the cephalic screw must always be inserted in the lower portion of the femoral head.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7956521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chir Organi Mov        ISSN: 0009-4749


  8 in total

1.  3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years experience at a single centre.

Authors:  Alicja J Bojan; Claudia Beimel; Andreas Speitling; Gilbert Taglang; Carl Ekholm; Anders Jönsson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 2.  Fatigue failure of the cephalomedullary nail: revision options, outcomes and review of the literature.

Authors:  Adam Tucker; Michael Warnock; Sinead McDonald; Laurence Cusick; Andrew P Foster
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-17

3.  [Proximal femur fractures: results and complications after osteosynthesis with PFN and TGN].

Authors:  M Müller; A Seitz; L Besch; R E Hilgert; A Seekamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Methods to avoid gamma nail complications.

Authors:  Raffaele Pascarella; Giuseppe Cucca; Alessandra Maresca; Matteo Commessatti; Giovanni Bracci; Stefano Boriani; Enrico Gozzi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-05-21

5.  Complications following Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures with the Gamma3 Nail: Is the Latest Version of Gamma Nail Superior to Its Predecessor?

Authors:  Dimitrios Georgiannos; Vasilios Lampridis; Ilias Bisbinas
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-02-06

6.  Breakage of a third generation gamma nail: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Takashi Iwakura; Takahiro Niikura; Sang Yang Lee; Yoshitada Sakai; Kotaro Nishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2013-05-20

7.  Intertrochanteric fracture non-unions with implant failure of the gamma nail.

Authors:  Mouhcine Sbiyaa; Adil El Alaoui; Mohammed Admi; Kamal Lahrach; Amine Marzouki; Fawzi Boutayeb
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Breakage in Two Points of a Short and Undersized "Affixus" Cephalomedullary Nail in a Very Active Elderly Female: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rollo; Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Paolo Pichierri; Michele Bisaccia; Auro Caraffa; Luigi Meccariello
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.