Literature DB >> 18493831

Methods to avoid gamma nail complications.

Raffaele Pascarella1, Giuseppe Cucca, Alessandra Maresca, Matteo Commessatti, Giovanni Bracci, Stefano Boriani, Enrico Gozzi.   

Abstract

Femoral neck fractures are progressively increasing, due to higher survival rates, particularly among the female population. The gamma nail was created to treat intertrochanteric fracture types 31-A1, 31-A2 and 31-A3 and in some cases basicervical fractures of type 31-B2-1. Complications can be classified as intraoperative and postoperative. The intraoperative might be related to the nail's introduction site, lag and distal locking screw positions. Postoperative complications depend mostly on an incorrect surgical technique, which can lead to an inaccurate nail position and consequent implant failure. We rarely observe failures caused by severe bone osteoporosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493831     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-007-0030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chir Organi Mov        ISSN: 0009-4749


  10 in total

1.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  S H Bridle; A D Patel; M Bircher; P T Calvert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-03

2.  Use of the Gamma nail in the treatment of fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  J A Valverde; M G Alonso; J G Porro; D Rueda; P M Larrauri; J J Soler
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The standard Gamma nail: a critical analysis of 1,000 cases.

Authors:  C Kukla; T Heinz; C Gaebler; G Heinze; V Vécsei
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2001-07

4.  Multicenter trial of modified Gamma nail in East Asia.

Authors:  K S Leung; C M Chen; W S So; K Sato; C H Lai; B Machaisavariya; S Suntharalingam
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A prospective comparative study of the compression hip screw and the gamma nail.

Authors:  P R Goldhagen; D R O'Connor; D Schwarze; E Schwartz
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Gamma versus DHS nailing for extracapsular femoral fractures. Meta-analysis of ten randomised trials.

Authors:  M J Parker; G A Pryor
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Intramedullary fixation of high subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a study comparing two implant designs, the Gamma nail and the intramedullary hip screw.

Authors:  J Rantanen; H T Aro
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.512

8.  A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail.

Authors:  P J Radford; M Needoff; J K Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

9.  The results of a multicenter Italian study on the use of the Gamma nail for the treatment of pertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: a review of 1181 cases.

Authors:  S Boriani; F De Iure; G Bettelli; L Specchia; P Bungaro; G Montanari; A Capelli; P Canella; R Regnoli; C Triscari
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  1994 Apr-Jun

10.  Pertrochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail: technique and report of early results.

Authors:  J Davis; M B Harris; M Duval; R D'Ambrosia
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.390

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  A simple reproducible technique for the retrieval of broken proximal femoral blades, a technical note and review of literature.

Authors:  Mohamed A Imam; Ziad Harb; David Elliott
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-10-13

Review 2.  Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty After Failed Basicervical Hip Fracture Fixation: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Vineet Tyagi; Oluwaseun Akinbo
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2017

3.  How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System.

Authors:  R Pascarella; R Fantasia; A Maresca; C Bettuzzi; L Amendola; S Violini; F Cuoghi; P Sangiovanni; S Cerbasi; S Boriani; D S Tigani
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2015-12-14

4.  Is the lag screw sliding effective in the intramedullary nailing in A1 and A2 AO-OTA intertrochanteric fractures? A prospective study of Sliding and None-sliding lag screw in Gamma-III nail.

Authors:  Yi Zhu; Severin Meili; Changqing Zhang; Congfeng Luo; Bing-fang Zeng
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  Complications following Treatment of Trochanteric Fractures with the Gamma3 Nail: Is the Latest Version of Gamma Nail Superior to Its Predecessor?

Authors:  Dimitrios Georgiannos; Vasilios Lampridis; Ilias Bisbinas
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2014-02-06

6.  Benefit of lag screw placement by a single- or two-screw nailing system in elderly patients with AO/OTA 31-A2 trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Fulong Zhao; Lijuan Guo; Xuefei Wang; Yakui Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Comparison of the Sliding and Femoral Head Rotation among Three Different Femoral Head Fixation Devices for Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Nobuaki Chinzei; Takafumi Hiranaka; Takahiro Niikura; Mitsuo Tsuji; Ryosuke Kuroda; Minoru Doita; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-08-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.