Literature DB >> 7954994

Optimizing sedation following major vascular surgery: a double-blind study of midazolam administered by continuous infusion.

D R Miller1, R J Martineau, K A Hull, F Vallée, M LeBel.   

Abstract

A randomized, double-blind study was undertaken to determine the dose requirements, recovery characteristics, and pharmacokinetic variables of midazolam given by continuous infusion for sedation in patients following abdominal aortic surgery. Thirty subjects, 50-75 yr, scheduled to undergo aortic reconstructive surgery, entered the study. Following a nitrous oxide-isoflurane-opioid anaesthetic technique, patients were randomly allocated to receive one of three loading doses (0.03, 0.06 or 0.1 mg.kg-1) and initial infusion rates (0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) of midazolam, corresponding to groups low (L), moderate (M) and high (H). The infusion of midazolam was adjusted to maintain sedation levels of "3, 4 or 5," which permitted eye opening in response to either verbal command or a light shoulder tap, using a seven-point scale ranging from "0" (awake, agitated) to "6" (asleep, non-responsive). Additionally morphine was given in increments of 2.0 mg iv prn for analgesia. On the morning after surgery, midazolam was discontinued, and the tracheas were extubated when patients were awake. Blood samples were taken during, and at increasing intervals for 48 hr following discontinuation of the infusion, and analyzed by gas chromatography. The desired level of sedation was maintained during more than 94% of the infusion period in all three groups, with a maximum of three dose adjustments per patient, for treatment which lasted 16.3 +/- 0.6 hr. There was, however, an increase in both the infusion rates and mean plasma concentrations from Group L to Group H (P < 0.05), which corresponded to an inverse relationship of morphine requirements during the period of sedation (P < 0.05, Group H vs Group L). Optimal midazolam infusion rates and resulting plasma concentrations at the times the infusions were discontinued (in parentheses) were as follows-Group L: 0.60 +/- 0.18 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (76 +/- 32 ng.mL-1), Group M: 0.90 +/- 0.52 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (133 +/- 71 ng.mL-1), and Group H: 1.34 +/- 0.69 microgram.kg-1.min-1 (206 +/- 106 ng.mL-1). Times to awakening were longer in Group H: 3.1 +/- 3.4 hr, than in Group L: 1.1 +/- 0.8 h, P < 0.05. Pharmacokinetic variables were found to be dose-independent over the range of infusion rates. Mean values were t1/2 beta = 4.4 +/- 1.5 hr, CL = 5.94 +/- 1.69 mL.min-1.kg-1, Vd = 3.13 +/- 1.07 L.kg-1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7954994     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  30 in total

1.  Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  M A Hughes; P S Glass; J R Jacobs
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Psychiatric complications of open-heart surgery.

Authors:  D S KORNFELD; S ZIMBERG; J R MALM
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1965-08-05       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Oxidation of midazolam and triazolam by human liver cytochrome P450IIIA4.

Authors:  T Kronbach; D Mathys; M Umeno; F J Gonzalez; U A Meyer
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  A glossary of anesthetic jargon.

Authors:  E I Eger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Morphine and fentanyl anesthetic interactions with diazepam: relative antagonism in rats.

Authors:  I Kissin; P T Brown; E L Bradley
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Use of sedating drugs and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients requiring mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure. A national survey.

Authors:  J H Hansen-Flaschen; S Brazinsky; C Basile; P N Lanken
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Midazolam sedation following open heart surgery.

Authors:  H M Mathews; I W Carson; P S Collier; J W Dundee; K Fitzpatrick; P J Howard; S M Lyons; I A Orr
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Alfentanil pharmacokinetics in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  R J Hudson; I R Thomson; P M Burgess; M Rosenbloom
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Pharmacokinetics of sufentanil in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  R J Hudson; R G Bergstrom; I R Thomson; M A Sabourin; M Rosenbloom; L Strunin
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  Cardiopulmonary bypass and the pharmacokinetics of drugs. An update.

Authors:  W A Buylaert; L L Herregods; E P Mortier; M G Bogaert
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.