Literature DB >> 7952638

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by precordial compression but without mechanical ventilation.

W Tang1, M H Weil, S Sun, D Kette, F Kette, R J Gazmuri, F O'Connell, J Bisera.   

Abstract

It is widely held that mechanical ventilation is essential for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, cardiac output and therefore pulmonary blood flow is reduced to less than one-third of normal during CPR. We therefore reasoned that ventilatory requirements are correspondingly reduced and postulated that gas exchange may be maintained during precordial compression with oxygen passively delivered to the airway in the absence of mechanical ventilation. After tracheal intubation, Sprague-Dawley rats were randomized. Fifteen animals were maintained on positive-pressure ventilation with room air and an additional 15 animals breathed spontaneously. Cardiac arrest was induced by electrical fibrillation. The inspired gas concentration of oxygen was then increased to 100% in both groups. Precordial compression was begun after 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation. After an additional 6 min of precordial compression, resuscitation was attempted by DC countershock. During cardiac resuscitation, there were no significant differences in coronary perfusion pressure between mechanically ventilated and spontaneously breathing animals, but arterial PO2 was significantly lower and arterial PCO2 was significantly higher in the absence of positive-pressure ventilation. However, neither resuscitability nor 24-h survival were affected. Postresuscitation myocardial contractility, reflected in the maximally generated dP/dt40, was also not adversely affected. In the unventilated group, only resuscitated animals developed spontaneous gaspings at an average frequency of 17 +/- 2/min-1. The current emphasis on mechanical ventilation as the highest priority for cardiopulmonary resuscitation is therefore not fully supported under the experimental conditions of this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7952638     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.6.7952638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  4 in total

1.  A randomized trial of continuous versus interrupted chest compressions in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: rationale for and design of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Continuous Chest Compressions Trial.

Authors:  Siobhan P Brown; Henry Wang; Tom P Aufderheide; Christian Vaillancourt; Robert H Schmicker; Sheldon Cheskes; Ron Straight; Peter Kudenchuk; Laurie Morrison; M Riccardo Colella; Joseph Condle; George Gamez; David Hostler; Tami Kayea; Sally Ragsdale; Shannon Stephens; Graham Nichol
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.749

2.  A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique.

Authors:  Lorissa Lamoureux; Jeejabai Radhakrishnan; Raúl J Gazmuri
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  Gasping in response to basic resuscitation efforts: observation in a Swine model of cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Mathias Zuercher; Gordon A Ewy; Charles W Otto; Ronald W Hilwig; Bentley J Bobrow; Lani Clark; Vatsal Chikani; Arthur B Sanders; Robert A Berg; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2010-05-31

4.  Comparison of CPR quality and rescuer fatigue between standard 30:2 CPR and chest compression-only CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial.

Authors:  Jonghwan Shin; Seong Youn Hwang; Hui Jai Lee; Chang Je Park; Yong Joon Kim; Yeong Ju Son; Ji Seon Seo; Jin Joo Kim; Jung Eun Lee; In Mo Lee; Bong Yeun Koh; Sung Gi Hong
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.953

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.