Literature DB >> 7949748

Longitudinal measurement of regional and whole body bone mass in young healthy adults.

D O Slosman1, R Rizzoli, C Pichard, A Donath, J P Bonjour.   

Abstract

The so-called peak bone mass (PBM) represents the highest amount of bony tissue achieved during life at a given site of the skeleton. It has been suggested that PBM might be achieved as late as the fourth decade, but recent data have indicated that PBM is already achieved by the end of sexual maturation, namely at the end of the second decade. The solving of this apparent controversy is of interest for a better understanding of bone homeostasis and for defining the cohort of normal subjects to be evaluated in order to establish a PBM reference range--necessary for the diagnosis of osteoporosis and evaluation of the fracture risk. To study bone mass evolution in young healthy adults and to determine whether such a cohort can be used to establish PBM reference values, we measured bone mineral density (BMD) in sixty 20- to 35-year-old young healthy adults by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the levels of the lumbar spine (in both anteroposterior and lateral views), femoral neck, trochanter region, total hip and of Ward's triangle, as well as whole-body BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. In the cross-sectional analysis, none of the bone mass variables was dependent on age using linear regression analysis. The longitudinal study indicated that the mean changes in lumbar spine, proximal femur and whole body BMD or BMC determined after a 1-year interval were not statistically different from zero in either females or males aged 20-35 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7949748     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  19 in total

Review 1.  Interpretation of bone densitometry measurements: disadvantages of a percentage scale and a discussion of some alternatives.

Authors:  A M Parfitt
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Comparative study of the performances of X-ray and gadolinium 153 bone densitometers at the level of the spine, femoral neck and femoral shaft.

Authors:  D O Slosman; R Rizzoli; B Buchs; F Piana; A Donath; J P Bonjour
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

3.  The definition and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  B E Nordin
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Premenopausal bone loss in the lumbar spine and neck of femur: a study of 225 Caucasian women.

Authors:  A Rodin; B Murby; M A Smith; M Caleffi; I Fentiman; M G Chapman; I Fogelman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Continuing bone growth throughout life: a general phenomenon.

Authors:  S M Garn; C G Rohmann; B Wagner; W Ascoli
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1967-05       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Measurement of bone mineral content of the lumbar spine by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry in normal children: correlations with growth parameters.

Authors:  C Glastre; P Braillon; L David; P Cochat; P J Meunier; P D Delmas
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Longitudinal monitoring of bone mass accumulation in healthy adolescents: evidence for a marked reduction after 16 years of age at the levels of lumbar spine and femoral neck in female subjects.

Authors:  G Theintz; B Buchs; R Rizzoli; D Slosman; H Clavien; P C Sizonenko; J P Bonjour
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Bone mineral content and estimated total body calcium in normal adults.

Authors:  C Christiansen; P Rödbro
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 1.713

9.  Assessment of whole-body composition with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  D O Slosman; J P Casez; C Pichard; T Rochat; F Fery; R Rizzoli; J P Bonjour; A Morabia; A Donath
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Ethnic and genetic differences in bone mass: a review with a hereditary vs environmental perspective.

Authors:  W S Pollitzer; J J Anderson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  16 in total

1.  Physical activity is the strongest predictor of calcaneal peak bone mass in young Swedish men.

Authors:  U Pettersson; M Nilsson; V Sundh; D Mellström; M Lorentzon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Bone loss in men.

Authors:  C Gennari; R Nuti
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Alterations of bone microstructure and strength in end-stage renal failure.

Authors:  A Trombetti; C Stoermann; T Chevalley; B Van Rietbergen; F R Herrmann; P-Y Martin; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Age-related changes of whole skeleton and body composition in healthy men.

Authors:  R Nuti; G Martini; C Gennari
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Peak bone mass.

Authors:  J P Bonjour; G Theintz; F Law; D Slosman; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Peak Bone Mass and Patterns of Change in Total Bone Mineral Density and Bone Mineral Contents From Childhood Into Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Juan Lu; Yongyun Shin; Miao-Shan Yen; Shumei S Sun
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.617

7.  Do long term survivors of ewing family of tumors experience low bone mineral density and increased fracture risk?

Authors:  Gerhard M Hobusch; Iris Noebauer-Huhmann; Christoph Krall; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; David Goltzman; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; Stuart Jackson; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; K Shawn Davison; Robert G Josse; Jerilynn C Prior; David A Hanley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Attainment of peak bone mass at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and radius in men and women: relative contributions of bone size and volumetric bone mineral density.

Authors:  Yvette M Henry; Diana Fatayerji; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Effects of long-term strontium ranelate treatment on vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  P J Meunier; C Roux; S Ortolani; M Diaz-Curiel; J Compston; P Marquis; C Cormier; G Isaia; J Badurski; J D Wark; J Collette; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.