Literature DB >> 7944852

Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience.

B M Reilly1, C R Magnussen, J Ross, J Ash, L Papa, M Wagner.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The attitudes of hospitalized patients and their attending physicians about advance directives have not been well studied. We compared these attitudes and explored relationships between them and the frequency of actual directives and directive discussions during hospitalization.
METHODS: We conducted scripted interviews with 258 (94.5%) of 273 patients admitted consecutively to the acute medical service of a community teaching hospital in Rochester, NY, and contemporaneously surveyed their attending physicians (n = 68) regarding attitudes about advance directives. Primary outcome measures were patients' willingness to discuss directives, actual physician-patient directive discussions, and patients' preferences for life-sustaining treatments. Also measured were physicians' indications for directive discussions, their reasons not to discuss directives, and their knowledge and attitudes about life-sustaining treatments.
RESULTS: Eighty-one percent (172/212) of competent interviewed patients either did (100) or wanted to (72) discuss advance directives in hospital. Forty-one percent of patients chose to forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation; 24% to 41% refused other life-sustaining interventions (intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, vasopressors). Overall, 90% (246/273) of all patients met at least one of three criteria reported by their physicians as indications for advance directive discussions: age at least 75 years, critical or potentially fatal illness, and patients' desire to discuss directives. Multiple logistic regression revealed that these same variables predicted patients' willingness to discuss cardiopulmonary resuscitation, their preferences to receive or forgo cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the frequency of physician-patient discussions about these issues.
CONCLUSIONS: Most medical inpatients in a community hospital want to, are able to, and meet their own physicians' indications to discuss advance directives. Hospitalization presents an unrealized opportunity for physicians and patients to initiate these discussions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; St. Mary's Hospital (Rochester, NY)

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7944852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Advance directives in clinical practice].

Authors:  J Vollmann; I Knöchel-Schiffer
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-07-15

2.  The value of taking an 'ethics history'.

Authors:  G M Sayers; D Barratt; C Gothard; C Onnie; S Perera; D Schulman
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Timing of code status documentation and end-of-life outcomes in patients admitted to an oncology ward.

Authors:  Amanda Caissie; Nanor Kevork; Breffni Hannon; Lisa W Le; Camilla Zimmermann
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  What are cancer patients' preferences about treatment at the end of life, and who should start talking about it? A comparison with healthy people and medical staff.

Authors:  S Sahm; R Will; G Hommel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Would they follow what has been laid down? Cancer patients' and healthy controls' views on adherence to advance directives compared to medical staff.

Authors:  S Sahm; R Will; G Hommel
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2005

6.  Physicians' attitude toward recurrent hypercalcemia in terminally ill cancer patients.

Authors:  Akira Shimada; Ichiro Mori; Isseki Maeda; Hidekazu Watanabe; Nobutaka Kikuchi; Hansheng Ding; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A physician's guide to talking about end-of-life care.

Authors:  R B Balaban
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Code status orders and goals of care in the medical ICU.

Authors:  Thomas G Gehlbach; Laura A Shinkunas; Valerie L Forman-Hoffman; Karl W Thomas; Gregory A Schmidt; Lauris C Kaldjian
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Chikako Shimizu; Asao Ogawa; Takuji Okusaka; Saran Yoshida; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.