Literature DB >> 15717814

Breast cancer screening services: trade-offs in quality, capacity, outreach, and centralization.

Evrim D Güneş1, Stephen E Chick, O Zeynep Akşin.   

Abstract

This work combines and extends previous work on breast cancer screening models by explicitly incorporating, for the first time, aspects of the dynamics of health care states, program outreach, and the screening volume-quality relationship in a service system model to examine the effect of public health policy and service capacity decisions on public health outcomes. We consider the impact of increasing standards for minimum reading volume to improve quality, expanding outreach with or without decentralization of service facilities, and the potential of queueing due to stochastic effects and limited capacity. The results indicate a strong relation between screening quality and the cost of screening and treatment, and emphasize the importance of accounting for service dynamics when assessing the performance of health care interventions. For breast cancer screening, increasing outreach without improving quality and maintaining capacity results in less benefit than predicted by standard models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15717814     DOI: 10.1007/s10729-004-7538-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci        ISSN: 1386-9620


  37 in total

1.  Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.

Authors:  Laura Esserman; Helen Cowley; Carey Eberle; Alastair Kirkpatrick; Sophia Chang; Kevin Berbaum; Alastair Gale
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-03-06       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Emergency response to a smallpox attack: the case for mass vaccination.

Authors:  Edward H Kaplan; David L Craft; Lawrence M Wein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Women need better information about routine mammography.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards; Michael Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

4.  Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.

Authors:  P Salzmann; K Kerlikowske; K Phillips
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Use of a mathematical model to evaluate breast cancer screening policy.

Authors:  R D Baker
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1998-10

6.  All-cause mortality in randomized trials of cancer screening.

Authors:  William C Black; David A Haggstrom; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-02-06       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists.

Authors:  Edward A Sickles; Dulcy E Wolverton; Katherine E Dee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Cost effectiveness of shortening screening interval or extending age range of NHS breast screening programme: computer simulation study.

Authors:  R Boer; H de Koning; A Threlfall; P Warmerdam; A Street; E Friedman; C Woodman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-08

9.  The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.

Authors:  Robert M Saywell; Victoria L Champion; Terrell W Zollinger; Maltie Maraj; Celette Sugg Skinner; Kathleen A Zoppi; Carolyn M Muegge
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.229

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M Verkooijen; P H Peeters; E Buskens; V C Koot; I H Borel Rinkes; W P Mali; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

1.  Using simulation-optimization to construct screening strategies for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Laura A McLay; Christodoulos Foufoulides; Jason R W Merrick
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2010-06-05

2.  Applying reinforcement learning techniques to detect hepatocellular carcinoma under limited screening capacity.

Authors:  Elliot Lee; Mariel S Lavieri; Michael L Volk; Yongcai Xu
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2014-10-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.