Literature DB >> 7940711

HLA compatibility and liver transplant outcome. Improved patient survival by HLA and cross-matching.

A Nikaein1, L Backman, L Jennings, M F Levy, R Goldstein, T Gonwa, M J Stone, G Klintmalm.   

Abstract

In liver transplantation (LTx), numerous studies have failed to demonstrate an adverse effect of HLA-A,B,DR incompatibility or of donor-specific positive cross-match on survival of the recipients. In this study, we examined the effect of antidonor cytotoxic antibody and HLA compatibility in 800 LTx recipients with CsA-based immunosuppression. Thirty-four of 482 (7%) recipients were transplanted across a positive donor-specific T cell cross-match. Four-year patient and graft survival was 71% and 67%, respectively, in negative cross-match recipients and 53% and 50%, respectively, in positive cross-match recipients (P = 0.0051 and P = 0.023). Neither B cell-positive cross-match nor the presence of panel reactive antibody (PRA) had an adverse impact on the liver allograft outcome. Interestingly, 21/58 (36.2%) patients with PRA > or = 10% had a positive T cell cross-match, whereas only 7/382 (1.8%) patients with PRA < 10% did (P < 0.0001). This indicates the predictive value of PRA cross-match results. B lymphocyte cross-match results also were strongly correlated with the presence of PRA, as 26/57 (45.6%) of the patients with PRA > or = 10% had a positive cross-match, whereas only 22/394 (5.6%) with PRA < 10% did (P < 0.0001). Analysis of HLA compatibility demonstrated a significant impact on patient's survival, comparing only 0-2 vs. 6 HLA-A+B+DR mismatches and 0 vs. 1 vs. 2 HLA-DR mismatches. Four-year patient survival rate for 0 to 2 antigen mismatches was 86%, whereas for 6 antigen mismatches it was 62% (P = 0.025). Overall actuarial 4-year patient survival rate in HLA-DR-mismatched groups (0 vs. 1 vs. 2) was 84%, 73%, and 64%, respectively (P = 0.033). In no mismatched category was graft survival rate significantly different. Sepsis or rejection was the cause of graft loss in 1/10 (10%), 21/75 (28%), and 34/85 (40%) patients with 0, 1, and 2 HLA-DR mismatches, respectively. The difference between patient and graft survival was accounted for by survival after retransplantation, which was lower in patients with more HLA-DR mismatches in primary transplants. The latter group received intensive immunosuppressive therapy during the first month after primary transplantation, as compared with those with fewer HLA-DR mismatches (P = 0.04). The above data suggest that prospective cross-match should be performed in patients with > or = 10% PRA if it is logistically feasible.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7940711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  16 in total

1.  Increased bile duct complications and/or chronic rejection in crossmatch positive human liver allografts.

Authors:  S Takaya; A Jain; A Yagihashi; K Nakamura; M Kobayashi; K Takeuchi; S Suzuki; Y Iwaki; A J Demetris; S Todo; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  The impact of positive T-cell lymphocytotoxic crossmatch on intestinal allograft rejection and survival.

Authors:  G Bond; J Reyes; G Mazariegos; T Wu; N Schaefer; J Demetris; J J Fung; T E Starzl; K Abu-Elmagd
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatching on outcomes of liver transplantation: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiang Lan; Ming-Man Zhang; Cong-Lun Pu; Chun-Bao Guo; Quan Kang; Ying-Chun Li; Xiao-Ke Dai; Yu-Hua Deng; Qiang Xiong; Zhi-Mei Ren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Chronic rejection. A general overview of histopathology and pathophysiology with emphasis on liver, heart and intestinal allografts.

Authors:  A J Demetris; N Murase; R G Lee; P Randhawa; A Zeevi; S Pham; R Duquesnoy; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.530

5.  Assessing risk in liver transplantation. Special reference to the significance of a positive cytotoxic crossmatch.

Authors:  H R Doyle; I R Marino; F Morelli; C Doria; L Aldrighetti; J McMichael; J Martell; T Gayowski; T E Starzl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  The impact of human leukocyte antigen donor and recipient serotyping and matching on liver transplant graft failure in primary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Yuval A Patel; Jacqueline B Henson; Julius M Wilder; Jiayin Zheng; Schein-Chung Chow; Carl L Berg; Stuart J Knechtle; Andrew J Muir
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 7.  ABO-compatible liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an update.

Authors:  Anthony J Demetris; Adriana Zeevi; Jacqueline G O'Leary
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.640

8.  Expression of CD80 on Kupffer cells is enhanced in cadaveric liver transplants.

Authors:  J Kwekkeboom; M A Kuijpers; B Bruyneel; S Mancham; E De Baar-Heesakkers; J N M Ijzermans; G J Bouma; P E Zondervan; H W Tilanus; H J Metselaar
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Impact of surgical and immunological parameters in pediatric liver transplantation: a multivariate analysis in 500 consecutive recipients of primary grafts.

Authors:  Veerle Evrard; Jean-Bernard Otte; Etienne Sokal; Jean-Stéphan Rochet; Fabian Haccourt; Fabrizio Gennari; Dominique Latinne; Jacques Jamart; Raymond Reding
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Do Recipients of Genetically Related Donors Have Better Outcomes After Living Donor Liver Transplantation?

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sujeet K Saha; Sanjiv Saigal; Dheeraj Gautam; Neeraj Saraf; Amit Rastogi; Prashant Bhangui; Srinivasan Thiagrajan; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2019-12-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.