Literature DB >> 7938469

The influence of packing on free radical yields in crystalline nucleic acids: the pyrimidine bases.

W A Bernhard1, J Barnes, K R Mercer, N Mroczka.   

Abstract

The total free radical yield has been measured for crystals of five pyrimidine derivatives: thymine (T), 1-methylthymine (1MeT), 1-methyluracil (1MeU), 1-methylcytosine (1MeC) and cytosine monohydrate (C:HOH). Q-band EPR measurements were made on samples X-irradiated between 4 and 12 K. The G values in units of 10(-7) mol/J are 1MeC < 0.01, T < 0.04, 1MeU = 0.15, 1MeT = 0.25, and C:HOH = 0.8. The types of free radicals formed in these crystals are known through previous EPR investigations. A model is presented that attempts to identify the salient variables behind the large range in G values and, simultaneously, explain the variation in radical types. It is concluded that packing is a critical variable. Hydrogen-bonding networks promote the trapping of radicals through reversible proton transfer. In the absence of such a network less probable radical types are observed, such as radicals formed by irreversible protonation/deprotonation, higher-order reactions and homolytic bond cleavage. Crystals with low G values trap radicals formed predominantly by irreversible protonation/deprotonation at carbon positions and by excitation-spawned homolytic bond cleavage. In contrast, crystals with high G values trap radicals formed predominantly by reversible protonation/deprotonation at heteroatom positions. This model is extended to polynucleotides irradiated at low temperatures, where G values are typically 2-6. The high trapping efficiency seen in polynucleotides reflects highly efficient proton transfer. Consistent with this is the predominance of radicals formed by reversible protonation/deprotonation compared to those formed by irreversible protonation/deprotonation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7938469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  8 in total

1.  Free radical yields in crystalline DNA X-irradiated at 4 K.

Authors:  M G Debije; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  The influence of packing on free radical yields in solid-state DNA: film compared to lyophilized frozen solution.

Authors:  M T Milano; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  What is the initial chemical precursor of DNA strand breaks generated by direct-type effects?

Authors:  Shubhadeep Purkayastha; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  The effect of packing and conformation on free radical yields in films of variably hydrated DNA.

Authors:  M T Milano; W A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.841

5.  What fraction of DNA double-strand breaks produced by the direct effect is accounted for by radical pairs?

Authors:  Anita R Peoples; Kermit R Mercer; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 2.991

6.  Direct formation of the C5'-radical in the sugar-phosphate backbone of DNA by high-energy radiation.

Authors:  Amitava Adhikary; David Becker; Brian J Palmer; Alicia N Heizer; Michael D Sevilla
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  Mechanisms of direct radiation damage to DNA: the effect of base sequence on base end products.

Authors:  Kiran K K Sharma; Steven G Swarts; William A Bernhard
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.991

8.  On the chemical yield of base lesions, strand breaks, and clustered damage generated in plasmid DNA by the direct effect of X rays.

Authors:  Shubhadeep Purkayastha; Jamie R Milligan; William A Bernhard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.841

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.