Literature DB >> 7938281

Cranio-orbital reconstruction: safety and image quality of metallic implants on CT and MRI scanning.

P K Sullivan1, J F Smith, A A Rozzelle.   

Abstract

A study was undertaken to evaluate the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of metallic implants used in cranio-orbital reconstruction (stainless steel wire and titanium and Vitallium plates) and also to compare the degree of artifact created on computed tomographic (CT) scanning and MRI by each material. Samples of each material were tested for deflection (movement) in a 1.5-T MRI field and for temperature change under conditions simulating a clinical MRI scan. None of the materials exhibited any deflection, and none exhibited any significant temperature change compared with water. Standardized bars of each material and commonly used, commercially available titanium and Vitallium implants (plates, mesh) were evaluated for artifact. On blinded evaluation by three radiologists and on quantitative computer analysis of the CT images, the stainless steel produced the most artifact on both CT scan and MRI, followed by the Vitallium, with the least artifact caused by titanium. All the titanium images were felt to be acceptable to detect orbital pathology, while only the images with the thinnest Vitallium (micromesh) implant were acceptable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7938281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Choice of internal rigid fixation materials in the treatment of facial fractures.

Authors:  Mirko S Gilardino; Elliot Chen; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

2.  Polycaprolactone scaffold as targeted drug delivery system and cell attachment scaffold for postsurgical care of limb salvage.

Authors:  Bin Sheng Wong; Swee-Hin Teoh; Lifeng Kang
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.617

3.  Early experience with biodegradable implants in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Anastasios D Kanellopoulos; George N Nomikos; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Panayotis N Soucacos
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Efficacy of two point rigid internal fixation in the management of zygomatic complex fracture.

Authors:  Ashish Chakranarayan; G K Thapliyal; R Sinha; Menon P Suresh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-11-21

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the ophthalmologist: a primer.

Authors:  Arathi Simha; Aparna Irodi; Sarada David
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Beam hardening artifacts by dental implants: Comparison of cone-beam and 64-slice computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Farzad Esmaeili; Masume Johari; Pezhman Haddadi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-05

7.  Effect of Dental Implant Metal Artifacts on Accuracy of Linear Measurements by Two Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Systems Before and After Crown Restoration.

Authors:  Hoorieh Bashizadeh Fakhar; Roxana Rashtchian; Milad Parvin
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-11

8.  Preliminary experience with biodegradable implants for fracture fixation.

Authors:  Mandeep S Dhillon; Sharad Prabhakar; Chandiralingam Prasanna
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 9.  Material Science in Cervical Total Disc Replacement.

Authors:  Martin H Pham; Vivek A Mehta; Alexander Tuchman; Patrick C Hsieh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Biodegradable magnesium-based screw clinically equivalent to titanium screw in hallux valgus surgery: short term results of the first prospective, randomized, controlled clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Henning Windhagen; Kerstin Radtke; Andreas Weizbauer; Julia Diekmann; Yvonne Noll; Ulrike Kreimeyer; Robert Schavan; Christina Stukenborg-Colsman; Hazibullah Waizy
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.