Literature DB >> 7938246

Learned preferences for real-fed and sham-fed polycose in rats: interaction of taste, postingestive reinforcement, and satiety.

A Sclafani1, J W Nissenbaum, K Ackroff.   

Abstract

Nutrient-conditioned flavor preferences have been obtained with a variety of procedures, but one study indicates that rats do not readily learn to prefer the flavor of real-fed food to the flavor of sham-fed food. This issue was reexamined in food-deprived rats trained to real feed (gastric fistula closed) and sham feed (gastric fistula open) different flavored Polycose solutions (cherry or grape). Sham-feeding intakes in the one-bottle training sessions (30 min) were limited to the amount consumed in real-feeding sessions; intakes were not limited during two-bottle preference tests (10 min). In Experiment 1, when tested with 32% Polycose solutions, the animals tended to prefer the sham-fed Polycose to the real-fed Polycose. When subsequently trained and tested with 8% Polycose solutions, the same animals displayed a strong preference (approximately 90%) for the real-fed Polycose. These findings were confirmed in Experiment 2 using separate groups. Rats trained with 8% Polycose readily learned to prefer the real-fed solution, and rats trained with 32% Polycose initially preferred the sham-fed Polycose solution. With additional training the 32% Polycose group developed a preference for the real-fed solution. In experiment 3, rats trained to real feed flavored 8% and 32% Polycose solutions developed strong preferences for the 32% solution. This finding suggests that the tendency to prefer sham-fed to real-fed 32% Polycose is not due to aversive postingestive effects of the real-fed solution. Taken together, the results indicate that Polycose has a postingestive positive reinforcing effect that can be revealed using the sham-feeding preparation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7938246     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)90203-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  7 in total

Review 1.  Gut-brain nutrient signaling. Appetition vs. satiation.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Capsaicin-induced visceral deafferentation does not attenuate flavor conditioning by intragastric fat infusions in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2019-06-19

3.  Deconstructing the vanilla milkshake: the dominant effect of sucrose on self-administration of nutrient-flavor mixtures.

Authors:  Amy M Naleid; Jeffrey W Grimm; David A Kessler; Alfred J Sipols; Sepideh Aliakbari; Jennifer L Bennett; Jason Wells; Dianne P Figlewicz
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Operant licking for intragastric sugar infusions: Differential reinforcing actions of glucose, sucrose and fructose in mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-10-17

5.  Natural addiction: a behavioral and circuit model based on sugar addiction in rats.

Authors:  Bartley G Hoebel; Nicole M Avena; Miriam E Bocarsly; Pedro Rada
Journal:  J Addict Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.702

6.  Alterations in sucrose sham-feeding intake as a function of diet-exposure in rats maintained on calorically dense diets.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Nu-Chu Liang; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Flavor-nutrient learning is less rapid with fat than with carbohydrate in rats.

Authors:  Christina Humphries Revelle; Zoe S Warwick
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.