Literature DB >> 7937085

Inefficient excision of uracil from loop regions of DNA oligomers by E. coli uracil DNA glycosylase.

N V Kumar1, U Varshney.   

Abstract

Kinetic parameters for uracil DNA glycosylase (E. coli)-catalysed excision of uracil from DNA oligomers containing dUMP in different structural contexts were determined. Our results show that single-stranded oligonucleotides (unstructured) are used as somewhat better substrates than the double-stranded oligonucleotides. This is mainly because of the favourable Vmax value of the enzyme for single-stranded substrates. More interestingly, however, we found that uracil release from loop regions of DNA hairpins is extremely inefficient. The poor efficiency with which uracil is excised from loop regions is a result of both increased Km and lowered Vmax values. This observation may have significant implications in uracil DNA glycosylase-directed repair of DNA segments that can be extruded as hairpins. In addition, these studies are useful in designing oligonucleotides for various applications in DNA research where the use of uracil DNA glycosylase is sought.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7937085      PMCID: PMC308355          DOI: 10.1093/nar/22.18.3737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  26 in total

1.  DNA N-glycosidases: properties of uracil-DNA glycosidase from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  T Lindahl; S Ljungquist; W Siegert; B Nyberg; B Sperens
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  DNA repair enzymes.

Authors:  T Lindahl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 23.643

3.  Sequencing end-labeled DNA with base-specific chemical cleavages.

Authors:  A M Maxam; W Gilbert
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.600

4.  A general method for the purification of synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides containing strong secondary structure by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography on PRP-1 resin.

Authors:  M W Germann; R T Pon; J H van de Sande
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.365

5.  Comparison at the molecular level of uracil-DNA glycosylases from different origins.

Authors:  J P Leblanc; J Laval
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  1982 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 4.079

6.  Properties of purified uracil-DNA glycosylase from calf thymus. An in vitro study using synthetic DNA-like substrates.

Authors:  M Talpaert-Borlé; F Campagnari; D M Creissen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Sequence analysis, expression, and conservation of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase and its gene (ung).

Authors:  U Varshney; T Hutcheon; J H van de Sande
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1988-06-05       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Excision of uracil residues in DNA: mechanism of action of Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus uracil-DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  A M Delort; A M Duplaa; D Molko; R Teoule; J P Leblanc; J Laval
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1985-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Labelling oligonucleotides to high specific activity (I).

Authors:  A G Craig; D Nizetic; H Lehrach
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-06-26       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Parallel stranded DNA.

Authors:  J H van de Sande; N B Ramsing; M W Germann; W Elhorst; B W Kalisch; E von Kitzing; R T Pon; R C Clegg; T M Jovin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  7 in total

1.  Substitutions at tyrosine 66 of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase lead to characterization of an efficient enzyme that is recalcitrant to product inhibition.

Authors:  Narottam Acharya; Ramappa K Talawar; K Saikrishnan; M Vijayan; Umesh Varshney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Contrasting effects of single stranded DNA binding protein on the activity of uracil DNA glycosylase from Escherichia coli towards different DNA substrates.

Authors:  N V Kumar; U Varshney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Methylation inhibitors can increase the rate of cytosine deamination by (cytosine-5)-DNA methyltransferase.

Authors:  J M Zingg; J C Shen; A S Yang; H Rapoport; P A Jones
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Enzyme-mediated cytosine deamination by the bacterial methyltransferase M.MspI.

Authors:  J M Zingg; J C Shen; P A Jones
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Effects of mutations at tyrosine 66 and asparagine 123 in the active site pocket of Escherichia coli uracil DNA glycosylase on uracil excision from synthetic DNA oligomers: evidence for the occurrence of long-range interactions between the enzyme and substrate.

Authors:  Priya Handa; Narottam Acharya; Umesh Varshney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  APOBEC3G cytosine deamination hotspots are defined by both sequence context and single-stranded DNA secondary structure.

Authors:  Colleen M Holtz; Holly A Sadler; Louis M Mansky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) activities in Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens: characterization of a new class of UDG with broad substrate specificity.

Authors:  Ullas Valiya Chembazhi; Vinod Vikas Patil; Shivjee Sah; Wayne Reeve; Ravi P Tiwari; Euijeon Woo; Umesh Varshney
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.