Literature DB >> 7934592

Programming the cochlear implant based on electrical acoustic reflex thresholds: patient performance.

L G Spivak1, P M Chute, A L Popp, S C Parisier.   

Abstract

The electrical acoustic reflex threshold (EART) has been shown to be a reliable estimate of behavioral comfort levels in both child and adult cochlear implant patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential for using EARTs for programming the Nucleus cochlear implant. EARTs and behavioral comfort levels were obtained from 7 adult implant patients. Two programs or "maps" were made for each patient, one based on behavioral comfort levels and one based on EARTs. Performance on open set tests of speech recognition was measured with each map. Mean data suggest that speech perception is similar with both maps. Analysis of individual data revealed that, whereas 2 subjects performed better with the C-level maps, the remaining 5 subjects tended to perform either better with the EART map or equally well with both maps. These results suggest that EARTs may be an adequate substitute for comfort levels when programming the implant for patients who are unable to make reliable psychophysical judgments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7934592     DOI: 10.1288/00005537-199410000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  6 in total

1.  Impact of Aging and Cognition on Hearing Assistive Technology Use.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2015-08

2.  Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Reflectance and Stapedial Reflexes.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Joshua J Hajicek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

Review 4.  Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lavin K Entwisle; Sarah E Warren; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

5.  Cochlear implant programming: a global survey on the state of the art.

Authors:  Bart Vaerenberg; Cas Smits; Geert De Ceulaer; Elie Zir; Sally Harman; N Jaspers; Y Tam; Margaret Dillon; Thomas Wesarg; D Martin-Bonniot; L Gärtner; Sebastian Cozma; Julie Kosaner; Sandra Prentiss; P Sasidharan; Jeroen J Briaire; Jane Bradley; J Debruyne; R Hollow; Rajesh Patadia; Lucas Mens; K Veekmans; R Greisiger; E Harboun-Cohen; Stéphanie Borel; Dayse Tavora-Vieira; Patrizia Mancini; Helen Cullington; Amy Han-Chi Ng; Adam Walkowiak; William H Shapiro; Paul J Govaerts
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-04

6.  A comparison between neural response telemetry via cochleostomy or the round window approach in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Rogério Hamerschmidt; Luiz Henrique Schuch; Rodrigo Kopp Rezende; Gislaine Richter Minhoto Wiemes; Adriana Kosma Pires de Oliveira; Marcos Mocellin
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.