Literature DB >> 7931946

How far can a medial rectus safely be recessed?

B J Kushner1, M R Fisher, N J Lucchese, G V Morton.   

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that the location of the equator should be important in determining the site of a "safe maximum recession" of a rectus muscle, and that the location of the equator should be a function of axial length. Exactly where in relationship to the equator a muscle can be safely recessed has never been scientifically determined. Over a 4-year period, we measured axial length on all patients we operated on for strabismus. Using a previously derived formula, we were able to calculate the limbus-to-equator distance, given axial length. Based on our analysis of 28 patients in whom we recessed one or both medial recti posterior to the equator, we believe that recessions of the medial recti up to 1.5 mm posterior to the equator should not produce postoperative medial rectus underaction associated with an overcorrection, but recessions that are further than 1.5 mm posterior to the equator may do so. Recessions to a point greater than 11 mm from the limbus do not appear to be associated with late progressive overcorrection provided that the site of recession is not greater than 1.5 mm posterior to the equator. Using our previously determined formula for estimating the location of the equator, given axial length, we have generated easy-to-use reference tables for determining the location of the equator in terms of millimeters posterior to the limbus. Also, based on axial length data from 180 strabismus patients, we have generated an algorithm for predicting axial length, given age, and refractive error, which may be useful to the strabismus surgeon in predicting the location of the equator when A-scan ultrasonography is not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931946     DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19940501-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  8 in total

1.  Abnormal medial rectus insertion presenting exotropia: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Heeyoung Choi; Hyunkyu Kim; Hyeshin Jeon
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Globe-Tendon Interface for Extraocular Muscles: Is There an "Arc of Contact"?

Authors:  Robert A Clark; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-19       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Change in the location of the equator and recessed muscles in young rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Minwook Chang; Seung-Hyun Kim; Eun-Joo Yoo; Ki-Tae Nam; Yoonae A Cho
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Intraoperative Findings in Consecutive Exotropia with and without Adduction Deficit.

Authors:  Sarah R Hatt; David A Leske; Jae Ho Jung; Jonathan M Holmes
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 12.079

5.  The Effect of Axial Length on Extraocular Muscle Leverage.

Authors:  Robert A Clark; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  The Globe's Eccentric Rotational Axis: Why Medial Rectus Surgery Is More Potent than Lateral Rectus Surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Clark; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Comparison of predicted and measured axial length for ophthalmic lens design.

Authors:  Hyeong-Su Kim; Dong-Sik Yu; Hyun Gug Cho; Byeong-Yeon Moon; Sang-Yeob Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluating a new surgical dosage calculation method for esotropia.

Authors:  Siddharth Agrawal; Vinita Singh; Sanjiv Kumar Gupta; Saurabh Agrawal
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.