Literature DB >> 7931525

Discrimination of the direction of motion on the human hand: a psychophysical study of stimulation parameters.

E P Gardner1, B F Sklar.   

Abstract

1. In these experiments we assess the relative importance of the spatial and temporal properties of a moving tactile stimulus in determining the ability of humans to discriminate its direction of motion. Movement along the finger was simulated by applying a series of pulses to adjacent locations on the skin using the tactile array of an OPTACON stimulator. Simulated motion permitted us to vary independently the overall distance moved as well as the spacing, timing, and number of sequential stimuli. Different combinations of spatiotemporal parameters allowed us to further examine the relationship of apparent velocity of motion and sweep duration to behavioral performance. Discrimination accuracy was measured using signal detection techniques to calculate the discrimination parameter d' and PCmax, a bias-free measure of the percent correct identification of the direction of motion. 2. In experiments where the path length was constant, discriminability of the direction of motion increased as the spacing between successive pulses narrowed. Similarly, for a given interpulse spacing, the accuracy of discrimination increased linearly with distance, saturating at perfect performance. These apparent spatial effects on performance actually reflect the total number of stimuli presented to the skin rather than their proximity. Sweeps containing the same number of pulses are equally discriminable regardless of either their spacing or the total distance crossed on the skin. d' values obtained at 1.2-, 2.4-, and 4.8-mm spacings appear indistinguishable when plotted as a function of the total number of pulses in a sweep. 3. Experiments in which both the distance moved and the spacing between pulses was varied randomly confirmed that discrimination accuracy depends on the total number of pulses in a sweep rather than the spatial dimensions of the path traversed. Stimulation of only two points that mark the start and stop locations on the skin appears insufficient to enable subjects to discriminate correctly the direction of motion. Two-point stimulation elicits random performance whether the points lie 1.2 or 4.8 mm apart. Discriminability rises linearly to near-perfect performance when eight or more pulses are delivered sequentially. Extrapolation of the d' and PCmax curves suggests a mean threshold of approximately three points for 75% correct discrimination of the direction of motion across the skin. 4. The relationship of stimulus spacing to discriminability over a fixed path suggests that direction discrimination does not simply involve computation of the location of the start and stop points on the skin or their spatial disparity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931525     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.6.2414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Differences in curvature between constrained and unconstrained goal-directed movements to haptic targets.

Authors:  Marieke C W van der Graaff; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effect of posture change on tactile perception: impaired direction discrimination performance with interleaved fingers.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; Charlotte Harris; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of sound intensity on the audiotactile crossmodal dynamic capture effect.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The tactile motion aftereffect suggests an intensive code for speed in neurons sensitive to both speed and direction of motion.

Authors:  S McIntyre; I Birznieks; R M Vickery; A O Holcombe; T Seizova-Cajic
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  The neural basis of tactile motion perception.

Authors:  Yu-Cheng Pei; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Study of single and multidigit activation in monkey somatosensory cortex using voltage-sensitive dye imaging.

Authors:  Anna Wang Roe; Jeremy E Winberry; Robert M Friedman
Journal:  Neurophotonics       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.593

7.  Human tactile detection of within- and inter-finger spatiotemporal phase shifts of low-frequency vibrations.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Motion Direction Discrimination with Tactile Random-Dot Kinematograms.

Authors:  Scinob Kuroki; Shin'ya Nishida
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-03-28

9.  Aging and the perception of tactile speed.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Jerica R Eaton; McKenzie L Gunter; Maheen Baig
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 4.996

10.  Relative posture between head and finger determines perceived tactile direction of motion.

Authors:  Yueh-Peng Chen; Chun-I Yeh; Tsung-Chi Lee; Jian-Jia Huang; Yu-Cheng Pei
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.