Literature DB >> 7930763

Sagittal split advancement osteotomies stabilized with miniplates. A 2-5-year follow-up.

J P Scheerlinck1, P J Stoelinga, P A Blijdorp, J J Brouns, M L Nijs.   

Abstract

Skeletal stability, temporomandibular joint (TMJ)-function, and inferior alveolar nerve function were evaluated in 103 patients with mandibular hypoplasia who were treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomies to advance the mandible. Stable internal fixation was obtained with miniplates and four monocortical screws. The follow-up period was at least 24 months (average: 32 months; maximum: 60 months). The average B-point advancement was 5.85 mm. Ninety-three patients of 103 (90.3%) had no appreciable relapse at B-point. Eight (7.7%) patients had relapse because of condylar resorption. Maximum mouth opening decreased an average of 1 mm. Sixty-eight percent of the patients with preoperative TMJ-dysfunction symptoms reported improvement or resolution of their symptoms. Sixteen percent experienced worsening of their TMJ symptoms. Permanent neurosensory deficits were identified in five patients (five sides).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7930763     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80285-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  15 in total

1.  Three-dimensional surgical guide approach to correcting skeletal Class II malocclusion with idiopathic condylar resorption.

Authors:  Hongzhe Wang; Chaoran Xue; En Luo; Wenyu Dai; Rui Shu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Evaluation of condylar morphology following orthognathic surgery on digital panoramic radiographs. Could methodology influence the range of "normality" in condylar changes?

Authors:  P Scolozzi; A Momjian; D S Courvoisier; S Kiliaridis
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Skeletal stability after bilateral sagittal split advancement and setback osteotomy of the mandible with miniplate fixation.

Authors:  Srinivasan Hanumantha Rao; Loganathan Selvaraj; Arathy S Lankupalli
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2013-11-20

4.  Long-term stability and condylar remodeling after mandibular advancement: A 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Lauren Ehardt; Antonio Ruellas; Sean Edwards; Erika Benavides; Matthew Ames; Lucia Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Skeletal relapse following sagittal split ramus osteotomy advancement.

Authors:  Nanda Kishore Sahoo; Balakrishnan Jayan; Ankur Thakral; Vishvaroop Nagpal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-09-13

Review 6.  The value of long-term follow-up of mandibular advancement surgery in patients with a low to normal mandibular plane angle.

Authors:  J P Bouwman; D B Tuinzing; P J Kostense; R A van Teeseling; H Mokhtari
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-11

7.  Condylar Reshape in Orthognathic Surgery: Morphovolumetric and Densitometric Analysis Based on 3D Imaging and Digital Workflow.

Authors:  Vincenzo Abbate; Giovanni Audino; Giovanni Dell'Aversana Orabona; Marco Friscia; Paola Bonavolontà; Carmelo Lo Faro; Umberto Committeri; Carlos Navarro Cuéllar; Giorgio Iaconetta; Luigi Califano
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

8.  An Evaluation of Jaw Tracking Movements in Patients with Total Joint Replacements versus a Control Group.

Authors:  Farhana Rahman; Felice Femiano; Patrick J Louis; Chung How Kau
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 2.948

9.  Closure of anterior open bites with mandibular surgery: advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Authors:  Joseph E Van Sickels; Aaron Wallender
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-09-04

Review 10.  A new technique for mandibular osteotomy.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.