Literature DB >> 7929685

Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis.

V A Marchman1, E Bates.   

Abstract

Several recent studies have demonstrated strong relationships between lexical acquisition and subsequent developments within the domain of morphosyntax. A connectionist model of the acquisition of a morphological system analogous to that of the English past tense (Plunkett & Marchman, 1993) suggests that growth in vocabulary size may relate to the onset of over-regularization errors. However, this model suggests that the relationships between vocabulary size and morphosyntactic development are non-linear. Incremental increases in the number of verbs to be learned result in qualitative shifts in the treatment of both previously learned and novel forms, but only after the size of the lexicon exceeds a particular level (i.e. reaches a 'critical mass'). In this paper we present parental report data from an extensive study of English-speaking children aged 1;4 to 2;6 using the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory: Toddler form (N = 1130). These data corroborate several findings from previous studies, including the early usage of unmarked verb stems and the correct production of irregular past tense forms. Further, we demonstrate support for the 'critical mass' view of the onset of over-regularization errors, focusing on continuity among lexical and morphological developments. In our view, these data suggest that these linguistic milestones may be paced by similar, if not identical mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7929685     DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900009302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Lang        ISSN: 0305-0009


  40 in total

1.  Dynamics of Word Comprehension in Infancy: Developments in Timing, Accuracy, and Resistance to Acoustic Degradation.

Authors:  Renate Zangl; Lindsay Klarman; Donna Thal; Anne Fernald; Elizabeth Bates
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2005

2.  Grammatical Difficulties in Children with Specific Language Impairment: Is Learning Deficient?

Authors:  Hsinjen Julie Hsu; Dorothy V M Bishop
Journal:  Hum Dev       Date:  2011-01

3.  Grammatical Abilities in Young Cochlear Implant Recipients and Children With Normal Hearing Matched by Vocabulary Size.

Authors:  Jongmin Jung; David J Ertmer
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.408

4.  Phonological bases for L2 morphological learning.

Authors:  Chieh-Fang Hu
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2010-08

5.  An Eye-Tracking Study of Receptive Verb Knowledge in Toddlers.

Authors:  Matthew James Valleau; Haruka Konishi; Roberta Michnick Golinkoff; Kathy Hirsh-Pasek; Sudha Arunachalam
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Dynamic Linguistic Interconnectedness and Variability in Toddlers.

Authors:  Kakia Petinou; Loukia Taxitari; Ioannis Phinikettos; Eleni Theodorou
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  What You Hear and What You Say: Language Performance in Spanish English Bilinguals.

Authors:  Thomas M Bohman; Lisa M Bedore; Elizabeth D Peña; Anita Mendez-Perez; Ronald B Gillam
Journal:  Int J Biling Educ Biling       Date:  2010

8.  Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition.

Authors:  James L McClelland; Matthew M Botvinick; David C Noelle; David C Plaut; Timothy T Rogers; Mark S Seidenberg; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  A cross-linguistic and bilingual evaluation of the interdependence between lexical and grammatical domains.

Authors:  Gabriela Simon-Cereijido; Vera F Gutiérrez-Clellen
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2009

10.  Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children.

Authors:  Nereyda Hurtado; Virginia A Marchman; Anne Fernald
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.