Literature DB >> 7928827

Changes in urinary pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivities, 1971-1992.

R N Grüneberg1.   

Abstract

Unselected urinary pathogens from general practice and hospital have been tested for sensitivity to a range of antimicrobial agents for the last 22 years. There have been substantial changes. In general practice there has been a considerable increase in the proportion of staphylococcal infections from 5.1% to a peak of 14.8% in 1982 and a more recent decline to 4.0%. There has also been a decrease in the proportion caused by proteus mirabilis, from 9.2% to 4.3%. Similar, but smaller, changes have been observed in the proportions of hospital urinary tract infections caused by these organisms, while the proportion of hospital infections due to Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. has fallen from 16.8% to 7.3%. These and other changes have been reflected in the changing patterns of sensitivity to antibiotics. In particular, sensitivity of urinary pathogens to ampicillin/amoxycillin has continued to fall both in general practice and in hospital. Nalidixic acid resistance is becoming more important as the proportion of Gram-positive urinary pathogens (especially enterococci) increases. More organisms were sensitive to ciprofloxacin than the other drugs tested, with little evidence of increasing resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7928827     DOI: 10.1093/jac/33.suppl_a.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  19 in total

Review 1.  Antibacterial use in pregnancy.

Authors:  T M Weller; E N Rees
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Validity of susceptibility testing of uropathogenic bacteria in general practice.

Authors:  L Bjerrum; P Grinsted; P Hyltoft Petersen; P Søgaard
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism probabilistic database for identification of bacterial isolates from urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Yankuba Kassama; Paul J Rooney; Royston Goodacre
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Risk factors for antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from hospitalized patients with urinary tract infections: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Sotto; C M De Boever ; P Fabbro-Peray; A Gouby; D Sirot; J Jourdan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Enterobacter spp.: pathogens poised to flourish at the turn of the century.

Authors:  W E Sanders; C C Sanders
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  ACP Best Practice No 167: the laboratory diagnosis of urinary tract infection.

Authors:  J C Graham; A Galloway
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Cotrimoxazole. Rationale for re-examining its indications for use.

Authors:  R A Howe; R C Spencer
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Uropathogen antibiotic resistance in adult women presenting to family physicians with acute uncomplicated cystitis.

Authors:  Warren J McIsaac; Tony Mazzulli; Rahim Moineddin; Janet Raboud; Susan Ross
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Antimicrobial resistance patterns of urinary tract pathogens and rationale for empirical therapy in Turkish children for the years 2000-2006.

Authors:  Ferhat Catal; Nuket Bavbek; Omer Bayrak; Musemma Karabel; Duran Karabel; Ender Odemis; Ebru Uz
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric urology.

Authors:  Seung-Hun Song; Kun Suk Kim
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.